Prevalence and Serotype of Poultry Salmonellosis in Africa: a Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

ABSTRACT

Salmonellosis represents a significant economic and public health concern for the poultry industry in Africa, leading to substantial economic losses due to mortality, reduced productivity, and food safety problems. However, comprehensive information on the burden of poultry salmonellosis at the continental level are scarce. To address this gap, a systemic review and meta-analysis were conducted to consolidate information on the prevalence and circulating serotypes of poultry salmonellosis in African countries. This involved the selection and review of 130 articles published between 1984 and 2021. A detailed systematic review protocol was structured according to Cochrane STROBE and PRISMA statement guidelines. From the 130 selected articles from 23 different African countries, the overall pooled prevalence estimate (PPE) of poultry salmonellosis in Africa was found to be 14.4% (95% CI= 0.145-0.151). Cameroon reported the highest PPE at 71.9%, with the country also noting the highest specific prevalence of 93.3%. The PPE was notably high in meat and meat products at 23%, indicating significant contamination of Salmonella in African poultry meat and meat products. The number of research papers reporting poultry salmonellosis in Africa has been a threefold increase from 1984 to 2021. Salmonella Enteritidis and Typhimurium were the two most prevalent serotypes reported in 18 African countries. Besides, Salmonella Kentucky, Virchow, Gallinarum, and Pullorum were also widely reported. Western Africa had the highest diversity of reported Salmonella serotypes (141), in contrast to southern Africa, which reported only 27 different serotypes. In conclusion, poultry salmonellosis is highly prevalent across Africa, with a variety of known serotypes circulating throughout the continent. Consequently, it is crucial to implement strategic plans for the prevention and control of Salmonella in Africa.

KEYWORDS:

• Africa
• Meta-analysis
• Salmonella
• Serotype
• Poultry and Review

Disclaimer

As a service to authors and researchers we are providing this version of an accepted manuscript (AM). Copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proofs will be undertaken on this manuscript before final publication of the Version of Record (VoR). During production and pre-press, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal relate to these versions also.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank you for the NASCERE project and G. Antonissen, who was supported by the Chair of Poultry Health Sciences (Ghent University—Vetworks bvba—Poulpharm bvba).

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Ethical statement

The authors confirmed the review and meta-analysis was conducted on ethically approved and published articles. Therefore, the review was not conducted on live animals.