7
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Primary Dacryocystorhinostomy for Acute Dacryocystitis: A Systematic Review

ORCID Icon, &
Received 26 Mar 2024, Accepted 13 Apr 2024, Published online: 16 May 2024
 

ABSTRACT

Introduction

Acute dacryocystitis is a common condition occurring secondary to nasolacrimal duct obstruction. We aim to assess the efficacy of primary dacryocystorhinostomy for the management of acute dacryocystitis.

Methods

A systematic search of the databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL was performed to December 2023. Data extraction and risk of bias analysis was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

Results

Fourteen articles fulfilled inclusion criteria. The results demonstrated that for the treatment of acute dacryocystitis, primary dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is anatomically and functionally efficacious, with low complication rates and minimal risk of recurrence. The anatomical success rates for primary endonasal DCR (EnDCR) were 81.8–100%, 83.8–87.5% in delayed EnDCR and 66–100% in delayed external DCR (ExDCR). Functional success was generally defined as a subjective absence of epiphora, which was achieved in 86.4–92.0% of primary EnDCR, and 0–89.5% of the delayed ExDCR cohorts. Two randomized controlled trials established equivalent rates of functional success between primary versus delayed EnDCR (87.5% vs 87.5% and 91.3% vs 92.3%). Increased perioperative bleeding was recorded in 27.8% of primary EnDCR cases in 1 study. ExDCR was infrequently associated with postoperative fistula and scar formation and cicatricial punctal ectropion. The mean length of admission trended to be shorter when the procedure was performed closer to the acute presentation. The admission time for all primary EnDCR cases varied between 1 and 7 days.

Conclusion

Primary dacryocystorhinostomy is an efficacious and safe management option for acute dacryocystitis. Further analyses of health-economics are required.

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

SOURCES OF SUPPORT

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Additional information

Funding

The authors reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 530.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.