67
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The use of Latent Class Analysis (LCA) to Assess Children’s Movement Behaviours Measured by Accelerometer and Self-report

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 255-266 | Published online: 19 Feb 2024
 

ABSTRACT

Latent Class Analysis (LCA) is a statistical method that can help researchers interested in better understanding the movement behaviors (MB) of children, based on the analysis of the level of physical activity (PA) and sedentary time (ST). This study aimed to evaluate and compare two models LCA (one for the accelerometer and one for the 24-hour recall) that represent the MB of children. A cross-sectional study involving 101 10-year-old Brazilian children. The classes were based on vigorous PA (VPA), moderate PA (MPA), light PA (LPA), and sedentary time (ST). To assess these behaviors, a 24-hour recall and an accelerometer were used. The accelerometer was used during four days. The time spent on each of the MB was categorized dichotomously, based on the 25th and 75th percentiles. Thus, “adequate” times were considered when the ST was below 25thP, the LPA and MPA were above 25thP and the VPA was above 75thP. LCA was used to model the variable “MB.” For each latent class model (accelerometer and recall), two classes were found: “Adequate MB” and “Inadequate MB.” Regardless of the method (accelerometer or self-report), the values of the “Inadequate MB” class had higher prevalence. Self-report predicted higher PA and lower ST compared to the accelerometer. The model based on accelerometry revealed that girls were 2.11 times more likely to belong to the “Inadequate MB” class when compared to boys. LCA was a multivariate statistical method that allowed the integrated evaluation of parameters that represent the MB analyzed by device-based and self-report methods.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all the students who participated in the study and the teachers, educators and principals who facilitated the research to take place.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

IRB approval

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee on Research involving Human Beings of the Federal University of Viçosa, under the decision number 177,174.

Supplemental data

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2024.2316605.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by Foundation Support Research of Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) and National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 389.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.