62
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Impact of environmental policy stringency on sectoral GHG emissions: evidence from Finland and Sweden by nonlinear quantile-based methods

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 04 Jan 2024, Accepted 02 Apr 2024, Published online: 08 Apr 2024
 

ABSTRACT

The growing societal concern regarding environmental matters has led to the implementation of many environmental measures intended to protect the environment and address global warming by lessening emissions and mitigating climate change. In line with this movement, this study scrutinizes the impact of these environmental measures on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to analyze the cases of Finland and Sweden. More specifically, the study employs the Environmental Policy Stringency (EPS) index as a proxy for environmental measures, explores sector-specific GHG emissions by employing nonlinear quantile-based methodologies (including quantile-on-quantile regression and Granger causality-in-quantiles methods as the primary model and quantile regression for robustness checking) spanning the period from 1991/Q1 to 2020/Q4. The findings show that: (i) EPS lessens GHG emissions from fuel exploitation, industrial combustion, and the power industry sector at lower and middle quantiles in Finland and Sweden; (ii) EPS decreases GHG emissions from processes, transportation, and waste sectors in Finland but increases them in Sweden at higher quantiles; (iii) EPS leads to an increase in GHG emissions from the agriculture and construction sectors at higher quantiles; (iv) EPS has a causal effect on sector-specific GHG emissions across different quantiles; (v) the robustness of the findings is largely confirmed. Hence, the study underscores the varying impacts of EPS on sectoral GHG emissions based on quantiles, sectors, and countries, emphasizing the need for policymakers to adopt environmental policies to comprise these differences and adjust the policy framework accordingly.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Authors’ contributions

The authors have contributed equally to this work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acronyms

ARDL=

Autoregressive Distributed Lags

BDS=

Broock, Scheinkman, Dechert, and LeBaron

CO2=

Carbon Dioxide

CS-ARDL=

Cross-Sectional ARDL

EDGAR=

Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research

EF=

Ecological Footprint

EKC=

Environmental Kuznets Curve

EPS=

Environmental Policy Stringency

ETS=

Emission Trading System

G-7=

Group of Seven

GHG=

Greenhouse Gas

GQ=

Granger Causality-in-Quantiles

OECD=

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development

PMG=

Pooled Mean Group

QQ=

Quantile-on-Quantile Regression

QR=

Quantile Regression

Availability of data and materials

Data will be made available on request.

Consent for publication

The authors are willing to permit the Journal to publish the article.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2024.2339509

Additional information

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 235.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.