ABSTRACT
Aspects of public service often involve tasks sometimes considered taboo, including working with grit, grime, blood, guts, grease, and stigmatized populations. Yet scholarship in our field directly incorporating dirty work remains limited yet growing. Importantly, if MPA students are not trained in how to work with and manage public sector employees engaged in such work, there is a chance for misunderstanding and mismanagement. In this paper, we draw on the concept of dirty work and showcase several ways how it can be incorporated into the MPA curriculum through topics such as regulation and compliance, emotional labor, budgeting and procurement, and public health. We rely on stories from deathcare workers throughout the U.S. to supplement the points. A dirty work practitioner from a large Iowa medical examiner department lends expertise in each section, and we conclude with case scenarios and questions for incorporating dirty work into MPA classes.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Staci M. Zavattaro
Staci M. Zavattaro, PhD, is professor of public administration at the University of Central Florida. Her research focuses on deathcare public service in the U.S.
Clayton Schuneman
Clayton Schuneman, NREMT, F-ABMDI, is the administrative director of the Johnson County Medical Examiner Department in Iowa. He is a board-certified Fellow of the American Board of Medicolegal Death Investigators and member of the Iowa Mortuary Operations Team.
Sharon H. Mastracci
Sharon H. Mastracci, PhD, is chair and professor of the Center for Public Administration and Policy (CPAP) at Virginia Tech University. She is a Fulbright Scholar and NAPA Fellow. Her research focuses on emotional labor in public service.