506
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Entrepreneurship & Innovation

Innovative marketing and sales promotion: catalysts or inhibitors of SME performance in Ghana

ORCID Icon, &
Article: 2353851 | Received 15 Nov 2023, Accepted 06 May 2024, Published online: 17 May 2024

Abstract

Innovative marketing (IM) drives success in small and medium enterprises (SMEs); however, the impact of sales promotions (SPs) remains a double-edged sword. This is the crux of this study, which examines the influence of IM and SP on SME performance in Ghana. Hierarchical regression analysis tested the hypotheses using a sample of SMEs registered with the Ghana Enterprises Agency. The results indicated a significant positive association between IM practices and SME performance. Contrary to expectations, SP exhibited a statistically significant negative association with SME performance. In addition, SP moderates the IM -performance link. The practical implication is that Ghanaian SMEs should synergistically integrate SPs and IM practices. This study addresses the pressing need for entrepreneurial marketing research grounded in the nuances of African economies, enriching the scholarly landscape.

1. Introduction

Entrepreneurship is a pivotal force driving economic growth (Amoah et al., Citation2022; Ajide & Soyemi, Citation2022; Agyapong et al., Citation2018), yet small and medium enterprises (SMEs) face significant challenges, particularly in developing economies. In Ghana, challenges with access to finance, tax burden, labor inadequacy and regulations, firm size, owner/manager experience and ownership type are typical impediments to the success and growth of SMEs (Mohammed & Bunyaminu, Citation2023). While ‘entrepreneurship is always full of challenges’ (Liguori & Pittz, Citation2020, p.109), strategic choices can significantly shape the performance of businesses. Notably, SMEs that make a strategic choice to innovate can effectively scale and thrive (Osano, Citation2023; Matekenya & Moyo, Citation2022). Small enterprises can elevate their competitiveness by adopting agile and resource-efficient marketing approaches that foster customer engagement and drive business success (Aksoy, Citation2017; Dwivedi & Pawsey, Citation2023). The strategic adoption of such marketing practices is vital, given the alarmingly high mortality rate that SMEs face (Jamil, Citation2023). The failure rate is even more acute in the Sub-Saharan African region, where more than 70% of SMEs cease operations within their inaugural year (Chinje, Citation2015).

Nonetheless, in the current dynamic business landscape, innovation is a cornerstone of success (Yohn, Citation2019), and it can serve as a potent catalyst for elevating SME performance, especially in environments where mortality rates are alarmingly high. As posited by Amin (Citation2021) and Sathana et al. (Citation2021), SMEs can amplify their success through the implementation of effective innovative marketing (IM) strategies. Besides IM, sales promotion (SP) also serves as a potent instrument for attracting new customers (Grewal & Roggeveen, Citation2020), thereby directly enhancing SME performance. Within the African ecosystem, small businesses often face constraints in accessing working capital, limiting their ability to invest in traditional marketing and advertising channels (Solomon et al., Citation2023). Thus, IM provides such enterprises with cost-effective options to achieve significant impact while requiring minimal investment in comparison (Nufer, Citation2021; Sathana et al.,Citation2021).

Given these insights, the general objective of this study is to advance the entrepreneurial marketing literature by examining the relationships among IM, SP and SME performance in Ghana. Consequently, this study addresses a notable gap in the literature by contextualizing the study within Ghana, a developing economy in Africa, as studies on initiatives in SMEs have primarily focused on developed economies (Agyapong et al., Citation2018). To guide in reaching the research objectives, this study builds on established theoretical frameworks, notably the diffusion of innovation (DOI) theory and the promotional mix theory. The DOI theory offers a comprehensive framework for comprehending the diffusion process of innovations within social systems, proposing a systematic sequence of adoption among individuals and groups (García-Avilés, Citation2020). Complementarily, the promotional mix theory encompasses a diverse array of marketing communication strategies used by firms to effectively engage target audiences and accomplish marketing objectives (Kotler & Keller, Citation2016).

IM represents a departure from conventional approaches, offering novel ways to promote products and firms (Purchase & Volery, Citation2020). These techniques encompass a spectrum of strategies, including social media engagement, influencer partnerships, experiential marketing, augmented reality experiences and personalized messaging (Lim et al., Citation2017; Kotler & Keller, Citation2016). For formal SMEs in Sub-Saharan Africa, such techniques are particularly important as they face competition from informal enterprises and encounter various obstacles that hinder their operations (Avenyo et al., Citation2021; Attrams & Tshehla, Citation2022). In response to the challenges faced by SMEs, it becomes imperative for them to leverage innovation-driven marketing tactics to differentiate themselves and carve out distinctive brand identities (Budden et al., Citation2021).

Analogously, SPs stand as a strategy capable of generating short-term sales spikes (Kotler & Keller, Citation2016). When deployed strategically, SPs can astutely inform targeting and positioning choices, cultivating an enduring sales momentum for products and helping maintain competitive advantage (Zeybek & Ülengin, Citation2022). They are particularly adept at attracting and retaining customers, exerting a direct influence on purchase behavior (Genchev & Todorova, Citation2017). Promotions encompass discounts, coupons and competitions, each serving distinct purposes in stimulating consumer behavior (Wang et al. Citation2020). Discounts reduce prices to incentivize purchases, clear out inventory or reward loyal customers (Lee & Chen-Yu, Citation2018). Coupons offer discounts tailored to specific customer segments, effectively driving sales (Wang et al., Citation2020). Competitions, on the other hand, create excitement and participation among consumers, augmenting brand awareness and sales (Cutright et al., Citation2022). Thus, promotion strategies incentivize consumers to purchase novel products while conferring benefits, such as monetary or non-monetary rewards (Fam et al., Citation2019). Essentially, SPs manifest as a potent instrument for attracting patrons to businesses (Grewal & Roggeveen, Citation2020), thereby possessing the potential to augment SME performance.

However, overreliance on SPs can condition customers to expect deals and reduce their willingness to pay full price, diminishing long-term profitability (Gedenk, Citation2022). In developing economies such as Ghana, the limited financial resources of SMEs (Mohammed & Bunyaminu, Citation2023; Attrams & Tshehla, Citation2022) may render the costs associated with implementing effective SP techniques, such as discounts or giveaways, a significant burden. Furthermore, many Ghanaian SMEs lack the necessary marketing expertise (GCB Bank, Citation2023) to design and execute impactful SP campaigns. Subpar SP outcomes may result from ineffective promotion instruments (Schultz & Block, Citation2014) or the difficulty consumers face in deciphering the promotion itself (Tan & Bogomolova, Citation2016), inter alia. The potential for sudden sales surges during SPs can engender demand volatility, which may impede sustainable supply chain agility (Chirra et al., Citation2021), consequently inhibiting SME performance. As stated by Gardner (Citation2022, p.18), ‘all sales promotions are not created equal’, suggesting that promotional activities may either catalyze or hinder the performance of SMEs.

SMEs in Ghana leverage IM and SP strategies to enhance marketing performance and gain competitive advantage (Afriyie et al., Citation2019; Quaye & Mensah, Citation2019), mirroring practices observed in other economies. IM approaches in Ghana encompass the strategic use of digital tools and platforms, such as websites, social media (e.g. Facebook and WhatsApp) and communication channels like short message service (SMS) and email, to enhance brand image, foster customer engagement and drive performance improvements (Siaw et al., Citation2023; Bruce et al., Citation2023), aligning with practices observed in other emerging economies. The proliferation of smartphones and internet connectivity in Ghana, now the 97th largest e-commerce market globally (GO-Globe, Citation2023), has enabled SMEs to adopt IM techniques. Social media (55.3%) represents the predominant channel used by Ghanaian SMEs to market their products and services, with Facebook emerging as the most prevalent form due to its widespread popularity (Dzisi & Ofosu, Citation2014). SP tactics employed in Ghana include bonus packs, coupons, samples, price discounts, rebates, contests and sweepstakes, strategically designed to evoke emotional responses and influence customer buying behavior (Ofosu-Boateng, Citation2020; Markwei et al., Citation2022). While various SP types have shown effectiveness in influencing consumer behavior and organizational performance in Ghana, bonus packs have the most direct impact on customer buying responses, followed by coupons, samples, price discounts and rebates (Markwei et al., Citation2022).

SME performance encompasses their ability to achieve objectives across various dimensions, including financial, operational and strategic aspects (Donkor et al., Citation2018). Financial performance is often characterized by metrics such as return on equity (ROE) and return on assets (ROA) (Amoa-Gyarteng & Dhliwayo, Citation2023). Operational performance gauges a firm’s capacity to efficiently deliver high-quality products or services, aligning with customer needs and delivery deadlines (Sahoo, Citation2021). Strategic performance, on the other hand, evaluates a firm’s adaptability to shifting market dynamics, its ability to identify new opportunities, and its response to competitive pressures (Islami et al., Citation2020). Generally, in SME evaluations, a blend of financial and non-financial criteria is essential, encompassing market share, sales growth, delivery speed and product quality (Amoa-Gyarteng et al., Citation2023).

While previous studies have mostly examined IM and SP constructs in developed economies (e.g. Aksoy, Citation2017; Ungerman et al., Citation2018; Akram et al., Citation2018; Chen & Lin, Citation2019; Gedenk, Citation2022), there is a conspicuous dearth of research within the context of developing economies like Ghana. This gap is fundamental because the economic and cultural milieu in which SMEs operate in such regions differs substantially from their industrialized counterparts. Therefore, this study serves as a direct response to the observations made by Damoah and Peprah (Citation2021), highlighting that despite the increasing volume of research focused on SMEs in Ghana, the pace of scholarly inquiry remains sluggish.

Against this backdrop, the specific objectives of this study are as follows: to examine the influence of IM on SME performance in Ghana, to examine the impact of SP on SME performance in Ghana, and to explore the moderating role of SP in the relationship between IM and SME performance in Ghana. In the Ghanaian context, SME classification hinges on factors such as employee count and fixed asset value (Amoah et al., Citation2022). The Ghanaian Ministry of Trade and Industry defines microenterprises as firms with up to five employees and $10,000 in fixed assets; small enterprises with six to 29 employees and $100,000 in assets; and medium enterprises with 30–99 employees and up to $1 million in assets (Afriyie et al., Citation2019).

In this study, the surveyed SMEs comprised a mix of manufacturing firms and service-oriented enterprises, and other business types operating within Kumasi, Ghana’s second-largest city. The results show that IM enhances SMEs performance, while there is a significant negative relationship between SP and SME performance in the Ghanaian context, suggesting that excessive discounting and price-based promotions can inhibit performance. However, the study also finds that strategically executed SP initiatives can amplify the effectiveness of IM practices and ultimately enhance SME performance in Ghana.

The study makes key contributions: First, it provides empirical insights on how SMEs in the Ghanaian context, representing a developing economy, can utilize IM practices such as social media engagement, to differentiate themselves, engage customers and drive performance improvements. Hence, this study extends the application of the DOI theory to an under-researched emerging market setting. Second, the study offers insights into the complex association between SP tactics (e.g. discounts, coupons) and SME performance in Ghana. As a result, this study provides valuable guidance on the application of the promotional mix theory to bolster SME survival in the challenging, informal, high-mortality business context of Ghana. Finally, by providing these contextual findings from the Ghanaian SME sector, the study offers valuable guidance to policymakers and SME owners on how to foster enterprise growth through the judicious deployment of IM and SP strategies. This can help SMEs in developing economies better navigate the obstacles they face and increase their chances of survival and success.

The remainder of this article is structured as follows: the next section reviews the relevant theoretical framework and formulates the study’s hypotheses. This is followed by a presentation of the methodology and research findings, culminating in a discussion of the study’s implications and conclusions.

2. Theoretical framework and hypothesis development

The DOI theory and the promotional mix theory are the foundations of this study.

2.1. Diffusion of innovation theory

Everett Rogers’ seminal theory, the ‘Diffusion of Innovation’, unveiled in 1962, provides an enduring and structured framework for comprehending the gradual propagation of novel ideas, behaviors, technologies or products throughout a societal milieu. It has withstood the rigors of academic scrutiny, rendering deep insights into the determinants of an innovation’s success or demise (Dearing, Citation2009). Within the DOI framework, five fundamental factors crystallize as pivotal determinants in the adoption of an innovation: ‘Relative Advantage’, which quantifies the perceived superiority of innovation over existing alternatives; ‘Compatibility’, measuring the extent to which the innovation aligns with the prevailing values, past experiences, and evolving needs of potential adopters; ‘Complexity’, assessing the cognitive demands associated with understanding and utilizing the innovation; ‘Trialability’, exploring the feasibility of limited experimentation with the innovation; and ‘Observability’, which pertains to identifying the extent to which the benefits or results of the innovation are visible to others (Scott et al.,Citation2008).

The DOI theory underscores the strategic imperative of focusing on early adopters by employing meticulously planned, targeted promotional and communication campaigns (Keshari, Citation2020). According to Keshari (Citation2020), SMEs that embrace IM strategies achieve demonstrable enhancements in performance. Within scholarly discourse, ‘Observability’ assumes a prominent position, as it captures the extent to which the outcomes of an innovation are manifest and discernible to the broader audience (Rogers, Citation1995). In the context of Ghanaian SMEs, studies have shown that the DOI theory provides a comprehensive framework for understanding innovation adoption, including IM strategies. For instance, Awiagah et al. (Citation2016) employed the DOI theory in conjunction with other frameworks to analyze factors influencing e-commerce adoption by SMEs in Ghana. Agyekum and Agyepong (Citation2017) utilized the theory and found that Ghanaian tech entrepreneurs adeptly facilitated innovation adoption through user-friendly products and social media advertising. Other studies in the Ghanaian context have applied the theory across themes such as innovation diffusion in student housing investment (Appau et al., Citation2023), technology adoption in SMEs (Selase et al., Citation2019), youth mobile banking adoption (Owusu et al., Citation2021), and more, utilizing it to understand factors impacting innovation adoption in the local context.

2.2. Promotional mix theory

Promotional mix theory is a fundamental framework in marketing communication that encompasses various methods and tactics a company employs to effectively reach and persuade its target market (OpenStax, Citation2023). It plays an essential role within the broader marketing mix, aligning communication methods to convey a cohesive message that caters to both organizational and consumer needs (Abdeta & Zewdie, Citation2021). The primary goal is to ensure that consumers not only receive the message but also interpret it in a way that fosters the intent to purchase (Koekemoer, Citation2004). To achieve this objective, marketers have a range of promotional tools at their disposal.

Traditionally, the promotional mix comprises four key elements: advertising, personal selling, SP and public relations (Hawari & Sudhartio, Citation2020). Advertising serves as an effective means for SMEs to enhance market exposure and build trust, ultimately leading to improved performance outcomes (Joensuu-Salo et al., Citation2022). SP tactics can entice customers to make purchases or try new products (Hawari & Sudhartio, Citation2020). Public relations initiatives contribute to building trust and credibility for SMEs, which, in turn, can lead to enhanced performance outcomes (Swaraj & Dasgupta, Citation2021). Personal selling plays a significant role in the promotional mix, particularly for SMEs, as effective personal selling strategies often result in improved performance outcomes (Keshari, Citation2020).

When services are integrated into the marketing strategy, the traditional four Ps expand to include seven elements, creating an extended or services marketing mix (Kasper et al., Citation2006). This extended mix encompasses people, processes and physical evidence, and SMEs in Ghana can utilize these components to efficiently reach and influence their target market, establish brand awareness and credibility, and ultimately drive sales. Promotional marketing activities generally fall into two broad theories: ‘push’ and ‘pull’. The ‘push’ strategy focuses on promoting products through distribution channels, where products are pushed to wholesalers, who then promote them to retailers, and subsequently, consumers can see and purchase the product. Conversely, the ‘pull’ strategy relies heavily on marketing communications to create awareness and desire, pulling consumers into stores to make purchases. In practice, a combination of both push and pull strategies is often used to stimulate demand effectively (Currie, Citation2017).

Promotional mix theory exhibits unique relevance for SMEs operating in the Ghanaian market. For example, given the informal nature of many businesses in Ghana’s economy (Avenyo et al., Citation2021; Attrams & Tshehla, Citation2022; Nkomo, Citation2013), firms utilize community-based marketing strategies for brand trust and credibility (Oppong et al., Citation2023). Resource constraints prompt digital advertising on social media over traditional mass media (Solomon et al., Citation2023; Sathana et al., Citation2021) and a collectivist culture (Marbell & Grolnick, Citation2013) results in SMEs using personal selling techniques, leveraging word-of-mouth recommendations. Ghanaian SMEs can leverage a combination of promotional mix elements, such as packaging, promotion and retail strategies, alongside IM approaches like pricing innovations and retailing innovations, to enhance their visibility, customer engagement, brand building and market advantage (Quaye & Mensah, Citation2019).

2.3. Innovative marketing and SME performance

IM is the practice of reaching out to and engaging customers using innovative and creative approaches (Kahn, Citation2018). It could entail introducing new products or services, utilizing new marketing channels or establishing a fresh marketing message (Afriyie et al., Citation2019). Thus, SMEs can successfully respond to changing market dynamics and fulfill evolving client expectations by implementing new marketing methods, hence increasing their market competitiveness (Thrassou et al., Citation2020). Furthermore, through targeted and interactive communication channels, IM promotes increased client involvement. Engaging customers using novel marketing tactics such as social media marketing, influencer marketing, and experiential marketing can develop deeper customer relationships and loyalty, leading to higher SME performance (Guerola-Navarro et al., Citation2022).

Content marketing, viral marketing and guerrilla marketing are examples of IM tactics that can greatly enhance brand visibility and recognition (Nufer, Citation2021; Saleem et al., Citation2022; Krishnan et al., Citation2022). SMEs that use these marketing techniques can effectively reach their target audience, build brand recall and generate positive word-of-mouth, all of which improve their performance (Keller et al., Citation2011). IM practices serve as a crucial lifeline for SMEs during challenging times like the COVID-19 pandemic, enabling them to adapt swiftly, reach customers effectively and ensure business survival. This resilience is further strengthened when complemented by other resources and support (Adam & Alarifi, Citation2021). Building upon the existing literature, we propose the hypothesis:

H1: There exists a positive and significant relationship between IM practices and SME performance in Ghana.

2.4. Sales promotion and SME performance

SP serves as a versatile strategy that covers a plethora of activities strategically designed to dramatize product offers and ignite immediate sales (Kotler & Keller Citation2016). These activities span from momentary price reductions and the distribution of coupons to the introduction of product enhancements, eye-catching in-store displays, product sampling exercises, and enticing premium offerings (Gedenk, Citation2022). One distinguishing feature of SPs is their immediate impact. Unlike IM strategies that require time to manifest results, the effects of SPs are often rapid and measurable (Zeybek & Ülengin, Citation2021). This immediacy not only suits the resource constraints of many SMEs but also enables them to establish causal relationships and gauge the effectiveness of their promotional efforts (Zeybek & Ülengin, Citation2022).

However, it is crucial to recognize that not every SP strategy yields the desired outcomes for SMEs. For instance, SMEs positioned at higher price points may instill a greater sense of confidence among consumers, thereby attracting a clientele that places less emphasis on price sensitivity (López-Jáuregui et al., Citation2019). In such cases, indiscriminate price-focused promotions may not align with the brand image and target audience, potentially diluting the perceived value and eroding profit margins. However, when applied with precision, SP can significantly amplify SME performance. It can draw in new customers and amplify sales volume (Mbwambo, Citation2019). The capacity to provide a temporary advantage, be it through price incentives or value additions, positions SMEs favorably in competitive markets (Joensuu-Salo et al., Citation2022). Additionally, by fostering engagement with existing customers, SPs encourage recurring business and brand loyalty, thus nurturing the pathway to sustainable growth (Kaveh et al., Citation2021; Ofosu-Boateng, Citation2020). Considering prior research, we advance the hypothesis that:

H2: There exists a positive and significant relationship between SP and SME performance in Ghana.

2.5. Moderating role of sales promotion on the innovative marketing and SME performance relationship

SPs, which are characterized by limited-time price discounts or special offers, can quickly draw consumer attention in highly competitive marketplaces (Zeybek & Ülengin, Citation2022). IM techniques, on the other hand, are intended to develop a long-term brand presence and reputation (Yohn, Citation2019). The conjunction of SPs with IM creates a dynamic interaction in which SPs serve as a catalyst, momentarily elevating market visibility. Subsequently, IM leverages this augmented visibility to nurture lasting brand recognition and consumer engagement, thus yielding incremental performance enhancements (Keller, Citation2020).

Thus, IM strategies excel in capitalizing on induced behaviors offered by SP by providing consumers with distinctive and memorable brand experiences (Li et al., Citation2021). Amidst disruptions in traditional consumer brand communications and heightened competition for consumer attention in a noisy environment, companies employ intensified engagement strategies to bolster brand loyalty and resonance (Wang, Citation2021). These interactions epitomize the synergistic convergence of IM approaches and SP endeavors. This association deepens consumer engagement, fosters client retention, and yields long-term performance benefits (Ascarza et al., Citation2018).

SMEs usually face price sensitivity among customers, necessitating prudent pricing tactics (Serrasqueiro et al., Citation2021). IM activities help differentiate SME offers over time, decreasing price sensitivity. Nonetheless, pricing remains critical in competitive environments. Hence, SPs can be adroitly deployed to confer momentary price competitiveness, thus capturing the attention of cost-conscious consumers (López-Fernández, Citation2020). This strategic coupling enables SMEs to introduce customers to novel product features or quality dimensions, reducing their reliance on price as the only factor and, as a result, improving SME performance. This is particularly important, as SPs are adept at yielding immediate revenue injections, a potentially vital lifeline for SMEs confronting transitory financial exigencies (Zeybek & Ülengin, Citation2021). Drawing upon the prevailing literature, we formulate the following hypotheses:

H3: SP moderates the relationship between IM and SME performance.

3. Conceptual model

In this conceptual framework (as presented in ), three essential components are delineated: IM practices, SP and SME performance. The study hypothesizes positive relationships between IM practices and SME performance, as well as between SP and SME performance, and introduces the concept of SP as moderating the link between IM practices and SME performance.

4. Methodology

The sample for this explanatory quantitative study was drawn from Kumasi, which is the second-largest city in Ghana. The study population comprised 3156 SMEs registered with the Ghana Enterprises Agency in Kumasi. The sample size was established using the Krejcie and Morgan (Citation1970) table for determining sample sizes based on population sizes. With a total population of 3156 and a desired precision level of 0.05 (5%), the required sample size was 342 (Krejcie & Morgan, Citation1970). This sample size ensures a 95% confidence level that the sample statistics will be within ±5% of the true population parameters. Therefore, the study sample comprised 342 owners/managers of small businesses randomly selected from the target population of 3,156. Participants were provided with written information about the study together with the questionnaire and subsequently gave their consent to participate. A total of 294 completed and usable questionnaires were collected, making them valid for statistical analysis. Thus, the study achieved a response rate of 85.96%.

4.1. Research instrument, data-collection procedure and statistical tools

The data were obtained through a structured questionnaire administered to participants in person during scheduled interviews. The data collected is quantitative in nature, comprising numerical responses to predetermined questions. Access to the dataset is restricted to authorized personnel for the purpose of data analysis and reporting. The study received ethical approval from the Ghana Baptist University College Ethics Committee. In quantitative research, questionnaires are often seen as a highly efficient data collection tool compared with other methods (Aithal & Aithal, Citation2020).

In our study, we designed a three-part questionnaire. The first section provides an overview of the study, including and guidelines contact information. The second section focuses on gathering basic demographic information about the participating respondents. This section included questions about gender, business nature, years of operation, the respondent education level, business ownership type and number of employees. The third section was dedicated to measuring the primary variables of SME performance, IM and SP, along with the quantification of the control variables.

To assess SME performance, we utilized measurement items sourced from Hogan and Coote (Citation2014). These items encompassed aspects such as ‘our firm has experienced growth in overall profitability, our firm has experienced growth in overall cash flow, our firm has maintained existing clients, our firm attracts new clients, and our firm achieves the desired market share’. Thus, the instrument assesses the financial health, client satisfaction, and market competitiveness of the firm. The items were evaluated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent). This evaluation captured respondents’ assessments of the previous 12 months. We assessed marketing innovation (MI) using a set of seven items. These items were designed to gauge various aspects of innovation in marketing strategies. They were modified from previous studies conducted by Naidoo (Citation2010), Sok et al. (Citation2013), and Afriyie et al. (Citation2019). Respondents were asked to rate items on a 7-point interval scale, with options ranging from ‘strongly agree’ as 1 to ‘strongly disagree’ as 7.

The items are as follows: ‘our company regularly utilizes IM communication techniques (e.g., social media engagement, user-generated content campaigns, etc.); we continuously seek novel approaches to strengthen relationships with our customers; our company regularly utilizes innovative promotional activities; our marketing strategies outpace competitors in innovation; we continuously enhance our product designs or service delivery to meet evolving customer needs; our company regularly utilizes innovative pricing approaches; and we consistently mine market data to uncover innovative emerging trends and customer insights’. In sum, the instrument evaluates the firm’s IM capabilities across its adoption, customer relations, promotional strategies, competitive positioning, product/service delivery, pricing strategies and market intelligence gathering.

We adopted and modified the SP assessment criteria from the work of Gorji and Siami (Citation2020) and Gedenk (Citation2022), encompassing a set of five items evaluated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (Strongly Agree) to 5 (Strongly Disagree). Respondents were prompted with questions such as ‘our company implements various SPs (such as coupons and discounts) to attract customers; our company showcases SPs displays prominently to enhance their impact; our company considers it important to differentiate our SPs from those of our competitors; our company believes that SPs significantly influence customer purchasing decisions; and our company faces challenges and limitations when implementing sales promotions’. Overall, the instrument measures various aspects related to the use, effectiveness and management of SP strategies within the firm.

In this study, we control for variables that are directly relevant to our research framework. Larger firms often benefit from economies of scale, which can lead to higher profitability, hence, following Amoa-Gyarteng and Dhliwayo (Citation2023), we control for firm size. Apart from firm size, we also control for firm age, industry type, marketing budget, and managerial experience as they exert a substantive influence on performance outcomes (Liu et al.,Citation2021; Ting et al., Citation2021; Storey, Citation1990).

In this study, as in similar research (e.g. Odoom & Mensah, Citation2019; Amoa-Gyarteng & Dhliwayo, Citation2024a, Citation2024b), we employed hierarchical regression analysis to evaluate the study’s hypotheses. Hierarchical regression analysis is a suitable method for examining hypotheses involving moderation because it enables the assessment of unique and interaction effects among multiple predictor variables on a criterion variable. The fundamental concept behind hierarchical regression is to progressively introduce predictor variables, including potential moderators, into the regression equation. This method involves a systematic step-by-step inclusion of predictor variables, allowing us to evaluate the incremental impact of each predictor on the criterion variable while controlling for the influences of previously incorporated predictors (Lewis, 2007).

To further strengthen the validation of our moderation findings, we utilized bootstrapping analysis in line with Amoa-Gyarteng and Dhliwayo (Citation2024a, Citation2024b). This rigorous statistical approach provides a robust and reliable assessment of the moderation effects, enhancing the credibility and confidence in our research results. Bootstrapping analysis involves resampling the data multiple times, generating a distribution of effects, and calculating confidence intervals, thereby ensuring the stability and accuracy of our conclusions (Egbert & Plonsky, Citation2021). The data analysis was carried out using Stata version 17 (StataCorp, College Station, TX).

4.2. Validity and reliability results

presents the psychometric properties of the research constructs. The constructs include SME performance, IM and SP. In quantitative research, it is often advisable to subject measuring scales and primary variables to validity and reliability assessments (Osei & Kagnicioglu, Citation2018). To assess the unidimensional properties of the variables, Cronbach’s alpha and factor loadings were conducted and employed. An overview of the reliability and validity tests is provided in . The internal consistency of the variables was tested using Cronbach’s alpha method (Cronbach, Citation1951; Jayaram & Tan, Citation2010). Statistically, values that meet or exceed 0.60 are considered highly reliable. In this study, Cronbach’s Alpha values were notably high, specifically 0.79 for SME performance, 0.80 for SP, and 0.87 for IM. Item validity was determined by factor analysis. According to Anderson and Gerbing (Citation1988), validity is confirmed when individual item loadings for each construct surpass the recommended cutoff point of 0.5. As presented in , the measurement instruments employed to assess each construct demonstrated loadings ranging from 0.60 to 0.80 for IM, from 0.65 to 0.85 for SP, and from 0.64 to 0.84 for SME Performance.

Table 1. Psychometric properties of the research constructs.

5. Results

This section discusses the study’s findings, both descriptive and inferential. A comprehensive assessment of multicollinearity was conducted by employing both correlation statistics and variance inflation factor (VIF) analysis, to evaluate the potential impact of inter-variable associations on the statistical analysis. As recommended in the literature (Hair et al., Citation2014), it is advisable to maintain correlation statistics below the threshold of 0.8 to ensure robustness in the analysis. In this study, every variable examined fell within the recommended range, confirming that inter-variable correlations remained well below the 0.8 threshold. Additionally, VIF values for all independent variables were found to be well below 5, indicating the absence of severe multicollinearity issues among the independent variables as posited by Becker et al. (Citation2015). This is shown in .

Table 2. Correlation matrix and VIF.

Summary statistics, including measures of central tendency (mean, median, and mode) and a measure of variability (standard deviation), were computed and are presented in . For ‘SME Performance’, the values ranged from 5.20 to 15.80, with a mean of 10.05 and a standard deviation of 2.68. Similarly, ‘Innovative Marketing’ shows a minimum of 5.17, a maximum of 13.83, a mean of 8.12, and a standard deviation of 2.45. ‘Sales Promotion’ exhibits values ranging from 4.20 to 15.20, with a mean of 7.94 and a standard deviation of 2.36. In the case of ‘Firm Size’, the range spans from 3.00 to 24.00, with a mean of 11.85 and a standard deviation of 3.62. ‘Firm Age’ shows values between 3.20 and 33.00, with a mean of 15.72 and a standard deviation of 5.34. ‘Marketing Budget’ ranges from $0.00 to $45,000, with a mean of $12,320 and a standard deviation of $11,250. Lastly, ‘Managerial Experience’ has values between 1.00 and 10.00, with a mean of 5.62 and a standard deviation of 2.34.

Table 3. Measurements of central tendency and variability, normality and autocorrelation.

Table 4. Hierarchical regression results.

The hierarchical multiple regression (HMR) technique was employed to examine the impact of IM strategies and SPs on the performance of SMEs in Ghana. This method involves the systematic introduction of predictor variables in multiple stages, which allows for the assessment of the incremental effect of each predictor on the criterion variable while adjusting for the effects of predictors entered in earlier stages. In the context of this study, there are six distinct stages.

Model 1 initiates the analysis, focusing on the influence of FirmSize on SME performance. Model 2 introduces FirmAge to assess its incremental explanatory power relative to FirmSize. Model 3 extends the exploration by evaluating the independent contribution of IndustryType to SME performance. Model 4 further enriches the analysis by incorporating ManagerialExperience, while controlling for FirmSize, FirmAge and IndustryType. Model 5 then delves into the role of MarketingBudget in SME performance, accounting for all preceding variables. Model 6 examines the impact of SP and IM (InnMkt) on SME performance. In addition, it explores the combined effect, represented by the interactive term InnMkt*SalesPromotion, to assess potential synergistic influences.

The econometric equations for the hierarchical regression models are provided below.

Model 1:

Y = β0 + β1FirmSize + e

Model 2:

Y = β0 + β1FirmSize + β2FirmAge + e

Model 3:

Y = β0 + β1FirmSize + β2FirmAge + β3IndustryType + e

Model 4:

Y = β0 + β1FirmSize + β2FirmAge + β3IndustryType + β4ManagerialExperience + e

Model 5:

Y = β0 + β1FirmSize + β2FirmAge + β3IndustryType + β4ManagerialExperience + β5MarketingBudget + e

Model 6:

Y = β0 + β1FirmSize + β2FirmAge + β3IndustryType + β4ManagerialExperience + β5MarketingBudget + β6InnMkt + β7SalesPromotion + β8InnMkt*SalesPromotion + e

where

Y = Dependent variable

β0 = Constant

β1 to β8 = Regression coefficients for each independent variablee = Error term

On the basis of the hierarchical regression results as seen in , we test the hypotheses as follows:

Hypothesis 1 asserts that within the Ghanaian context, a statistically significant relationship exists between IM practices and the performance outcomes of SMEs. This hypothesis is supported. In Model 6, the beta coefficient for IM is positive (β = 1.245) and statistically significant (p < o.001). This indicates a significant positive relationship between IM and SME performance.

Hypothesis 2 proposes that there exists a positive and significant relationship between SP and SME performance in Ghana. This hypothesis is not supported. In Model 6, the beta coefficient for SP is negative (β = −1.693) and statistically significant (p < .001). This indicates a significant negative relationship between SP and SME performance.

Hypothesis 3 suggests that the relationship between IM and SME performance is moderated by SP. This hypothesis is supported. In Model 6, the interaction term between IM and SP is statistically significant (β = 0.068, p < 0.001). This indicates that SP moderates the relationship between IM and SME performance. Additionally, the substantial increase in R-square from Models 1 to 6, along with the positive ΔR-square values at each step, suggests that the interaction between IM and SP contributes significantly to the explanation of SME performance variance. This supports the idea that SP moderates the relationship between IM and SME performance, as the interaction term captures the combined effect of IM and SP on SME performance beyond their individual effects and the control variables.

To further evaluate the moderation effect of SP on the relationship between (IM and SME performance, we employed a bootstrapping procedure as suggested by Hayes (Citation2017). We generated 1000 resamples by randomly drawing data with replacements from the original dataset while maintaining sample sizes. Each resample produced IM coefficients representing potential variations in the relationship. Aggregating these coefficients created a distribution, reflecting IM’s possible values under random variations. Confidence intervals (at a 95% confidence level) were constructed around the IM coefficient from this distribution. Comparing these intervals, with and without SP as a moderator, revealed potential moderation effects when they did not overlap. Statistical significance, determined by p values, indicated whether SP significantly influenced the IM-SME performance relationship. Findings, including effect sizes, confidence intervals, and statistical significance levels (), comprehensively assessed the moderation hypothesis.

Table 5. Bootstrapping analysis for the moderation effect.

In the bootstrap analysis, three key paths were examined to assess their influence on SME performance. The results are summarized as follows:

IM path: The path from IM to SME Performance yielded a coefficient estimate of 0.469 (p < 0.001), suggesting a significant positive relationship. The bootstrapped 95% confidence interval for this coefficient ranged from 0.352 to 0.586, further supporting the positive relationship. The effect size, as indicated by R2, was 0.311, underscoring the positive impact of IM on SME Performance.

SP path: The path from SP to SME performance revealed a coefficient estimate of −0.546 (p < 0.001), indicating a significant negative relationship. The bootstrapped 95% confidence interval ranged from −0.611 to −0.427, affirming the negative association between SP and SME performance. The effect size (R2) was 0.408, signifying the substantial impact of SP on SME performance.

Interaction (IM × SP) path: The interaction between IM and SP was examined, resulting in a coefficient estimate of 0.163 (p < 0.001). This indicates a significant positive relationship. The bootstrapped 95% confidence interval ranged from 0.119 to 0.197, reinforcing the positive association between this interaction term and SME Performance. The effect size (R2) for this interaction was 0.589, emphasizing its substantial influence on SME Performance. These bootstrap results provide robust evidence of the relationships among IM, SP, their interaction and SME Performance. The findings highlight the noteworthy contributions of IM and SP to SME Performance, while also underscoring the moderating effect of their interaction.

6. Discussion

The study showed that IM significantly improves SME performance within the context of Ghana. The study’s results align with previous research such as Oduro (Citation2019), who studied the ‘impact of innovation types on SMEs’ performance in the Cape Coast metropolis of Ghana’, Oloko et al. (Citation2014) and Slater et al. (Citation2010). As concluded by Quaye and Mensah (Citation2019), IM strategies, including new and modified product designs, novel retail and promotion tactics, and innovative pricing schemes, are key ingredients for SMEs in Ghana to achieve sustainable competitive advantage and enhanced performance. However, it contradicts the findings of Cheah et al. (Citation2023), who argue that IM has no direct impact on the performance of SMEs. IM can help SME performance in many ways. First, it helps SMEs engage with their target audience in more personalized and meaningful ways, leading to stronger customer relationships, increased loyalty and higher customer retention rates (Morgan-Thomas & Veloutsou, Citation2013). Second, IM allows SMEs to differentiate themselves from their competitors. By adopting unique approaches to product promotion, branding, or distribution, SMEs can carve out a niche in the market and gain a competitive edge (O’dwyer et al., Citation2009).

Furthermore, SMEs integrating IM show enhanced adaptability to market shifts and changing consumer preferences, enabling swift adjustments to emerging trends. This phenomenon is attributed to the core elements of IM, defined by distinctiveness (Cummins et al., 2000), novelty (Cummins et al., 2000; Kleindl et al., Citation1996) and a proactive inclination to deviate from traditional methods (Stokes, Citation2000; Kleindl et al., Citation1996). Hence, it is imperative for SME managers and owners in Ghana to prioritize and allocate dedicated investments towards IM endeavors, with a particular emphasis on enhancing overall performance.

Contrary to our initial hypothesis, this study also demonstrated a negative relationship between SP and SME performance in the Ghanaian context. In contrast to earlier investigations, such as Joensuu-Salo et al. (Citation2022) and Kaveh et al. (Citation2021), this outcome aligns with the conclusions drawn by Darke and Chung (Citation2005) and Raghubir and Corfman (Citation1999). These studies indicate that regular price discounts may result in consumers reevaluating their internal reference price, consequently associating lower prices with reduced quality. Moreover, when the size of the offer intersects with the reference price, an offer that is perceived as ‘unbelievable’ or excessively generous may lose its attractiveness, as indicated by the findings of Krishna et al. (Citation2002). Consumers may also deduce that the regular price was artificially inflated (Chen et al., Citation1998).

If not properly managed, SPs can inadvertently erode perceived value and harm a brand’s image (Gardner, Citation2022). Hence, for brands positioned as premium or luxury, careful consideration should be given to the judicious use of monetary SPs, as Yang et al. (Citation2016) advise, to mitigate the potential risk of devaluing the brand. SP has a negative relationship with the performance of SMEs in Ghana for a number of reasons. SPs in Ghana may be heavily reliant on price discounts and special deals. While these tactics can attract customers in the short term, they can erode profit margins and lead to financial instability for SMEs if they are not managed carefully (Mbwambo, Citation2019). Amidst the ongoing economic downturn in Ghana as indicated by Hyde (Citation2022), SMEs may grapple with resource constraints, posing a formidable obstacle to offering substantial discounts while safeguarding profitability. As such, the commitment of resources to promotional activities may strain the financial stability of such SMEs.

The study’s third objective examined the moderating role played by SP in shaping the correlation between IM strategies and the performance outcomes of SMEs. The regression findings indicate that SP indeed moderates the association between IM and SME performance. This is analogous to Bhatti’s (Citation2018) demonstration that IM, such as social media utilization, moderated the association between SPs and purchase intention among Pakistani consumers, a dimension of firm performance.

SP moderates the relationship between IM and SME performance in Ghana by enhancing the effectiveness and impact of IM strategies. SPs, such as discounts or special offers, can enhance the visibility and attractiveness of IM campaigns. When SMEs in Ghana introduce innovative products or marketing strategies, SPs can draw more attention and drive immediate sales (Shamsi & Khan, Citation2018; Yang & Mattila, Citation2020). Furthermore, IM strategies may involve new, untested approaches. SPs serve as a risk mitigation tool by providing a safety net. If a novel marketing strategy does not yield the expected results, well-executed SPs may help maintain sales and minimize the negative impact on SME performance.

6.1. Theoretical contributions

The study’s theoretical contribution lies in its synthesis of the DOI theory and the promotional mix theory to elucidate the relationships between IM, SP and SME performance in the specific context of Ghana. The study establishes a significant positive relationship between IM strategies and SME performance. It provides valuable empirical insights into how SMEs in Ghana, representing a developing economy, can leverage IM practices to drive performance improvements. By applying the DOI theory in this underexplored emerging market setting, the study extends the theoretical understanding of how SMEs in developing economies can harness IM approaches to enhance performance.

In contrast, the study demonstrates a significant negative relationship between SP and SME performance in Ghana. Drawing from the promotional mix theory, the study highlights that an overemphasis on SP strategies can hinder the performance of SMEs in this developing economy context. This advances the understanding that there should be a balanced approach to promotional mix strategies, rather than an excessive focus on SP. As concluded by Lim and Guzmán (Citation2022), excessively relying on SPs may diminish brand image and perception of quality, leading to a decline in brand equity.

A notable contribution of this study is the identification of the moderating role of SP in the relationship between IM and SME performance. This insight depicts the complex nature of marketing strategies within the SME context. It provides a theoretical basis for comprehending the complexities of marketing dynamics for SMEs, offering valuable guidance on the application of promotional mix theory to bolster SME survival in the challenging, informal, high-mortality business environment of Ghana.

6.2. Practical contributions and recommendations

The study’s findings strongly suggest that SMEs should prioritize the adoption of IM strategies to drive performance. Consequently, SME owners and managers should leverage social media platforms to engage customers, build brand awareness, and showcase offerings; utilize customer data and analytics for deeper market insights; continuously enhance product/service delivery; and develop informative content addressing target customers’ needs and pain points. These initiatives foster customer-centricity, enhanced credibility and enhanced performance.

This study also shows that SP has a negative relationship with SME performance in Ghana while simultaneously playing a positive moderating role in the relationship between IM and SME performance. This means that when strategically used, SPs can enhance the effectiveness of IM initiatives. For instance, a well-timed promotion can attract more attention to innovative product launches or marketing campaigns, leading to increased sales and customer engagement. The key is to strike a balance between SPs and IM efforts. SMEs in Ghana must carefully manage the frequency, timing and nature of their SPs to avoid eroding profit margins or devaluing their products or services. Owners of SMEs are advised to embrace SP mostly in synergy with IM methods to enhance performance.

7. Conclusions, limitations and future research

This study effectively addresses the central inquiry encapsulated in the title, ‘Innovative Marketing and SP: Catalysts or Inhibitors for SME Performance in Ghana’. Notably, this study represents a pioneering empirical investigation into the moderating role of SP within the relationship between IM and SME performance among Ghanaian SMEs. The study’s key conclusion underscores that SP serves as a performance enhancer for SMEs fully when paired with IM. In the absence of IM, SP yields unfavorable outcomes for SME performance in Ghana.

It is essential to acknowledge the study’s limitations, which subsequently open avenues for further research. The study’s scope was confined to a single Ghanaian city, Kumasi, thus limiting the generalizability of its findings to all SMEs in Ghana. Future research endeavors should encompass a broader array of emerging or developing economies to gain a more comprehensive comprehension of the association between SP, IM and SME performance. In addition, this study relied on cross-sectional data, which inherently lacks the capacity to portray the evolution of units over time and its repercussions on the studied outcomes (Solem, Citation2015). To enhance causal inference, bolster statistical robustness, capture phenomena more accurately and monitor transformations over time, prospective studies should consider employing longitudinal data.

Author contributions statement

Karikari Amoa-Gyarteng: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Software, Methodology, Original Draft Writing.

Shepherd Dhliwayo: Validation, Investigation, Writing, Review & Editing, Supervision.

Victoria Adekomaya: Visualization, Writing, Methodology, Software.

Disclosure statement

There are no interests to declare.

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, [K.A.G], upon reasonable request.

Figure 1. Authors’ conceptual model illustrating the interplay between innovative marketing, sales promotion, and SME performance.

Figure 1. Authors’ conceptual model illustrating the interplay between innovative marketing, sales promotion, and SME performance.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Karikari Amoa-Gyarteng

Karikari Amoa-Gyarteng is a research fellow at the University of Johannesburg, where he obtained his PhD. He also holds an MBA from Grand Canyon University. His research interests are entrepreneurship and financial management.

Shepherd Dhliwayo

Shepherd Dhliwayo is a professor at the Department of Business Management at the University of Johannesburg. He has a PhD in entrepreneurship from the University of Pretoria, which is his primary research focus.

Victoria Adekomaya

Victoria Adekomaya is a PhD candidate at the University of Johannesburg. Her research interest lies in entrepreneurship.

References

  • Abdeta, O. E., & Zewdie, S. (2021). The effects of promotional mix strategies on organizational performance: Evidence from systematic review of literature. International Journal of Business and Economics Research, 10(6), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20211006.14
  • Adam, N. A., & Alarifi, G. (2021). Innovation practices for survival of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the COVID-19 times: The role of external support. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 10(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-021-00156-6
  • Afriyie, S., Du, J., & Ibn Musah, A. A. (2019). Innovation and marketing performance of SME in an emerging economy: The moderating effect of transformational leadership. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 9(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40497-019-0165-3
  • Agyapong, G. T., Mmieh, F., & Mordi, C. (2018). Factors influencing the growth of SMEs: The case of Ghana. Thunderbird International Business Review, 60(4), 549–563. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21945
  • Agyekum, K. G., & Agyepong, S. A. (2017). The applicability of Rogers’ innovation diffusion model in the Ghanaian start-up ecosystem. In N. A. Amartey, B. E. Mends, P. Amekudzi, & E. T. Kongo (Eds.), INCEDI Proceedings. International Conference on Education, Development & Innovation (pp. 398–412). Methodist University College Ghana: Institute of Education and Entrepreneurship.
  • Aithal, A., & Aithal, P. S. (2020). Development and validation of survey questionnaire & experimental data a systematical review-based statistical approach. International Journal of Management, Technology, and Social Sciences (IJMTS), 5(2), 233–251.
  • Ajide, F., & Soyemi, K. A. (2022). Oil rent, entrepreneurial start-ups, and institutional quality: Insights from African oil-rich countries. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 10(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2022.100103
  • Akram, U., Hui, P., Kaleem Khan, M., Tanveer, Y., Mehmood, K., & Ahmad, W. (2018). How website quality affects online impulse buying: Moderating effects of sales promotion and credit card use. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 30(1), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-04-2017-0073
  • Aksoy, H. (2017). How do innovation culture, marketing innovation and product innovation affect the market performance of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)? Technology in Society, 51, 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.08.005
  • Amin, H. J. (2021). Influence of marketing strategies on the performance of SMEs: Evidence from Abuja SMEs. Journal of Economics and Business, 4(1), 204–307. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3813282. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1992.04.01.338
  • Amoa-Gyarteng, K., & Dhliwayo, S. (2023). Capital structure, profitability, and short-term solvency of nascent SMEs in Ghana: An empirical study. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 19(4), 83–110. https://doi.org/10.7341/20231943
  • Amoa-Gyarteng, K., & Dhliwayo, S. (2024a). Examining the moderating role of leadership in the nexus between organisational justice and employee performance in Ghanaian SMEs. African Journal of Business and Economic Research, 19(1), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.31920/1750-4562/2024/v19n1a16
  • Amoa-Gyarteng, K., & Dhliwayo, S. (2024b). Globalization, entrepreneurial development and unemployment: A mediation analysis in the context of South Africa. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 31(2), 272–297. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-03-2023-0126
  • Amoa-Gyarteng, K., Dhliwayo, S., & Adekomaya, V. (2023). Navigating containment challenges: A quantitative study of Ghanaian SME performance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Small Business International Review, 7(2), e587. https://doi.org/10.26784/sbir.v7i2.587
  • Amoah, J., Belas, J., Dziwornu, R., & Khan, K. A. (2022). Enhancing SME contribution to economic development: A perspective from an emerging economy. Journal of International Studies, 15(2), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2022/15-2/5
  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modelling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
  • Appau, M. W., Attakora-Amaniampong, E., & Yakubu, I. (2023). Innovation diffusion effects on student housing investment in Ghana. Property Management, 41(2), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1108/PM-06-2022-0043
  • Ascarza, E., Neslin, S. A., Netzer, O., Anderson, Z., Fader, P. S., Gupta, S., Hardie, B. G. S., Lemmens, A., Libai, B., Neal, D., Provost, F., & Schrift, R. (2018). In pursuit of enhanced customer retention management: Review, key issues, and future directions. Customer Needs and Solutions, 5(1–2), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40547-017-0080-0
  • Attrams, A. S., & Tshehla, M. (2022). Challenges of services sector SMEs in a developing country: A case of Ghana. Journal of the International Council for Small Business, 3(3), 228–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/26437015.2021.1982369
  • Avenyo, E. K., Konte, M., & Mohnen, P. (2021). Product innovation and informal market competition in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 31(2), 605–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-020-00688-2
  • Awiagah, R., Kang, J., & Lim, J. I. (2016). Factors affecting e-commerce adoption among SMEs in Ghana. Information Development, 32(4), 815–836. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666915571427
  • Becker, J. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Völckner, F. (2015). How collinearity affects mixture regression results. Marketing Letters, 26(4), 643–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-014-9299-9
  • Bhatti, A. (2018). Sales promotion and price discount effect on consumer purchase intention with the moderating role of social media in Pakistan. International Journal of Business Management, 3(4), 50–58.
  • Bruce, E., Shurong, Z., Ying, D., Yaqi, M., Amoah, J., & Egala, S. B. (2023). The effect of digital marketing adoption on SMEs sustainable growth: Empirical evidence from Ghana. Sustainability, 15(6), 4760. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064760
  • Budden, P., Murray, F., & Ukuku, O. (2021). Differentiating small enterprises in the innovation economy: Start-ups, new SMEs & other growth ventures. Working Paper, MIT Innovation Initiative.
  • Cheah, J., Leong, S. Y., & Fernando, Y. (2023). Innovation strategies and organisational performance: The moderating role of company size among small-and medium-sized companies. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 30(9), 2854–2868. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-03-2021-0139
  • Chen, S. C., & Lin, C. P. (2019). Understanding the effect of social media marketing activities: The mediation of social identification, perceived value, and satisfaction. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.025
  • Chen, S. F. S., Monroe, K. B., & Lou, Y. C. (1998). The effects of framing price promotion messages on consumers’ perceptions and purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing, 74(3), 353–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(99)80100-6
  • Chinje, N. B. (2015). Harnessing digital marketing to access markets: Opportunities for Africa’s SMEs. AfricaGrowth Agenda, 2015(10), 14–18.
  • Chirra, S., Raut, R. D., & Kumar, D. (2021). Barriers to sustainable supply chain flexibility during sales promotions. International Journal of Production Research, 59(22), 6975–6993. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1832272
  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
  • Cummins, D., Gilmore, A., Carson, D., & O’Donnell, A. (2000, July). What is innovative marketing in SMEs? Towards a conceptual and descriptive framework [Paper presentation]. AMA Conference Proceedings,.
  • Currie, M. (2017). Theories on the promotional mix. Bizfluent. https://bizfluent.com/info-8340520-theories-promotional-mix.html (Accessed 26 September 2023).
  • Cutright, K. M., Du, K., & Zhou, L. (2022). When praising the competition benefits your brand. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2022/03/research-when-praising-the-competition-benefits-your-brand (Accessed: 23 September 2023).
  • Damoah, O. B. O., & Peprah, A. A. (2021). Synthesis of small and medium enterprise research in Ghana. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 11(1), 451–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40497-021-00286-x
  • Darke, P. R., & Chung, C. M. (2005). Effects of pricing and promotion on consumer perceptions: It depends on how you frame it. Journal of Retailing, 81(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2005.01.002
  • Dearing, J. W. (2009). Applying diffusion of innovation theory to intervention development. Research on Social Work Practice, 19(5), 503–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731509335569
  • Donkor, J., Donkor, G. N. A., & Kwarteng, C. K. (2018). Strategic planning and performance of SMEs in Ghana: The moderating effect of market dynamism. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(1), 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-10-2017-0035
  • Durbin, J., & Watson, G. S. (1950). Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression: I. Biometrika, 37(3–4), 409–428. https://doi.org/10.2307/2332391
  • Dwivedi, A., & Pawsey, N. (2023). Examining the drivers of marketing innovation in SMEs. Journal of Business Research, 155, 113409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113409
  • Dzisi, S., & Ofosu, D. (2014). Marketing strategies and the performance of SMEs in Ghana. European Journal of Business and Management, 6(5), 102–111.
  • Egbert, J., & Plonsky, L. (2021). Bootstrapping techniques. In A Practical Handbook of Corpus Linguistics. Springer International Publishing. 593–610.
  • Fam, K. S., Brito, P. Q., Gadekar, M., Richard, J. E., Jargal, U., & Liu, W. (2019). Consumer attitude towards sales promotion techniques: A multi-country study. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 31(2), 437–463. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-01-2018-0005
  • García-Avilés, J. A. (2020). Diffusion of innovation. The international encyclopedia of media psychology (pp. 1–8). John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.
  • Gardner, M. J. (2022). Deal or no deal: Sales promotion influence on consumer evaluation of deal value and brand attitude. Small Business Institute Journal, 18(2), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.53703/001c.68379
  • GCB Bank (Ghana Commercial Bank). (2023). Sector industry study: SME sector in Ghana. Strategy and Research Department. Retrieved April 7, 2024, from https://www.gcbbank.com.gh/research-reports/sector-industry-reports/361-sme-sector-in-ghana-2023-v1/file
  • Gedenk, K. (2022). Measuring sales promotion effectiveness. In C. Homburg, M. Klarmann, & A. Vomberg (Eds.), Handbook of market research (pp. 1055–1071). Cham: Springer.
  • Genchev, E., & Todorova, G. (2017). Sales promotion activities–effective tool of marketing communication mix. Trakia Journal of Science, 15(1), 181–185. https://doi.org/10.15547/tjs.2017.s.01.033
  • GO-Globe. (2023, August 18). Ghana’s SME trailblazers: Accelerating ecommerce innovation. Retrieved April 2, 2024, from https://www.go-globe.com/ghanas-sme-trailblazers-accelerating-ecommerce-innovation/
  • Gorji, M., & Siami, S. (2020). How sales promotion display affects customer shopping intentions in retails. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 48(12), 1337–1355. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-12-2019-0407
  • Grewal, D., & Roggeveen, A. L. (2020). Understanding retail experiences and customer journey management. Journal of Retailing, 96(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2020.02.002
  • Guerola-Navarro, V., Gil-Gomez, H., Oltra-Badenes, R., & Soto-Acosta, P. (2022). Customer relationship management and its impact on entrepreneurial marketing: A literature review. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-022-00800-x
  • Hair, J. F., Jr, Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
  • Hawari, M., & Sudhartio, L. (2020, October). Implementing Promotional Mix at an SME with the Help of Business Coaching. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Business, Accounting and Economics, ICBAE 2020 (pp. 5–6). Purwokerto, Indonesia: EAI.
  • Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications.
  • Hogan, S. J., & Coote, L. V. (2014). Organizational culture, innovation, and performance: A test of Schein’s model. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1609–1621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.09.007
  • Hyde, P. (2022). Ghana’s woeful economic crisis: The challenges ahead. Forbes Africa. https://www.forbesafrica.com/economy/2022/11/02/ghanas-woeful-economic-crisis-the-challenges-ahead/ (Accessed 26 September 2023).
  • Islami, X., Mustafa, N., & Topuzovska Latkovikj, M. (2020). Linking Porter’s generic strategies to firm performance. Future Business Journal, 6(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-020-0009-1
  • Jamil, M. I. M. (2023). A discourse on entrepreneurial discontinuance, failure rates, and failed business models. Handbook of research on business model innovation through disruption and digitalization (pp. 115–135). IGI Global.
  • Jayaram, J., & Tan, K. C. (2010). Supply chain integration with third-party logistics providers. International Journal of Production Economics, 125(2), 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.02.014
  • Joensuu-Salo, S., Viljamaa, A., & Kangas, E. (2022). Marketing first? The role of marketing capability in SME growth. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 25(2), 185–202. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRME-05-2021-0070
  • Kahn, K. B. (2018). Understanding innovation. Business Horizons, 61(3), 453–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.01.011
  • Kasper, H., Van Helsdingen, P., & Gabbott, M. (2006). Services marketing management: A strategic perspective (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  • Kaveh, A., Nazari, M., van der Rest, J. P., & Mira, S. A. (2021). Customer engagement in sales promotion. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 39(3), 424–437. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-11-2019-0582
  • Keller, K. L., Parameswaran, M. G., & Jacob, I. (2011). Strategic brand management: Building, measuring, and managing brand equity. Pearson Education India.
  • Keller, K. L. (2020). Consumer research insights on brands and branding: A JCR curation. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(5), 995–1001. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucz058
  • Keshari, P. (2020). Innovative marketing strategies for small and medium enterprises of Western Madhya Pradesh (India): An analytical study. Small Enterprises Development. Management & Extension Journal, 47(2), 146–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0970846421103745
  • Kleindl, B., Mowen, J., & Chakraborty, G. (1996). Innovative market orientation an alternative strategic orientation. Conference Proceedings: Marketing Research at the Marketing/Entrepreneurship Interface (pp. 211–228). University of Illinois at Chicago.
  • Koekemoer, A. M. (2004). The effect of promotion mix elements on consumers buying decisions. International Journal of Business and Economics Research, 10(6), 236–245.
  • Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management. Pearson Education Limited.
  • Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
  • Krishna, A., Briesch, R., Lehmann, D. R., & Yuan, H. (2002). A meta-analysis of the impact of price presentation on perceived savings. Journal of Retailing, 78(2), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(02)00072-6
  • Krishnan, C., Majid Baba, M., Singh, G., & Mariappan, J. (2022). Viral marketing: A new horizon and emerging challenges. Principles of social networking: The new horizon and emerging challenges (pp. 161–175). Springer Nature Singapore.
  • Lee, J. E., & Chen-Yu, J. H. (2018). Effects of price discount on consumers’ perceptions of savings, quality, and value for apparel products: Mediating effect of price discount affect. Fashion and Textiles, 5(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-018-0128-2
  • Lewis, M. (2007, February 7). Stepwise versus hierarchical regression: Pros and Cons [Paper presentation]. The Annual Meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, San Antonio. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED534385.pdf; (accessed 20 September 2023).
  • Li, F., Larimo, J., & Leonidou, L. C. (2021). Social media marketing strategy: Definition, conceptualization, taxonomy, validation, and future agenda. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49(1), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-020-00733-3
  • Liguori, E. W., & Pittz, T. G. (2020). Strategies for small business: Surviving and thriving in the era of COVID-19. Journal of the International Council for Small Business, 1(2), 106–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/26437015.2020.1779538
  • Lim, W. M., & Guzmán, F. (2022). How does promotion mix affect brand equity? Insights from a mixed-methods study of low involvement products. Journal of Business Research, 141, 175–190.
  • Lim, X. J., Radzol, A. M., Cheah, J., & Wong, M. W. (2017). The impact of social media influencers on purchase intention and the mediation effect of customer attitude. Asian Journal of Business Research, 7(2), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.14707/ajbr.170035
  • Liu, Q., Qu, X., Wang, D., Abbas, J., & Mubeen, R. (2021). Product market competition and firm performance: Business survival through innovation and entrepreneurial orientation amid COVID-19 financial crisis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 790923. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.790923
  • López-Fernández, A. M. (2020). Price sensitivity versus ethical consumption: A study of millennial utilitarian consumer behavior. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 8(2), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-020-00074-8
  • López-Jáuregui, Á., Martos-Partal, M., & Labeaga, J. M. (2019). Impact of SMEs strategy on loyalty: The hairdresser case. Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC, 23(2), 273–293. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJME-11-2018-0051
  • Marbell, K. N., & Grolnick, W. S. (2013). Correlates of parental control and autonomy support in an interdependent culture: A look at Ghana. Motivation and Emotion, 37(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-012-9289-2
  • Markwei, M. E., Kingsford, A., Kofi, M. G. D., Apreh, S. G., & Ruth, A. A. (2022). Sales promotion tools, customer emotions and consumer buying responses in Ghana. African Journal of Marketing Management, 14(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMM2020.0659
  • Matekenya, W., & Moyo, C. (2022). Innovation as a driver of SMME performance in South Africa: A quantile regression approach. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 13(3), 452–467. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEMS-06-2021-0306
  • Mbwambo, A. J. (2019). [The influence of sales promotion on organization performance; An intermediaries perspective. A case study of Tanzania Portland cement company limited] [Doctoral dissertation]. The Open University of Tanzania.
  • Mohammed, I., & Bunyaminu, A. (2023). Barriers to business enterprises growth in Ghana. Small Enterprise Research, 30(2), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/13215906.2022.2039882
  • Morgan-Thomas, A., & Veloutsou, C. (2013). Beyond technology acceptance: Brand relationships and online brand experience. Journal of Business Research, 66(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.07.019
  • Naidoo, V. (2010). Firm survival through a crisis: The influence of market orientation, marketing innovation and business strategy. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(8), 1311–1320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.02.005
  • Nkomo, T. C. (2013). Emerging markets case study: Winning in Ghana. Harvard University. Retrieved on April 7, 2024, from https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/tnkomo/files/emerging_markets_case_study_-_ghana.pdf
  • Nufer, G. (2021). Innovative digital guerrilla marketing. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 12(3), 40–44. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijimt.2021.12.3.907
  • Odoom, R., & Mensah, P. (2019). Brand orientation and brand performance in SMEs: The moderating effects of social media and innovation capabilities. Management Research Review, 42(1), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-12-2017-0441
  • Oduro, S. (2019). Impact of innovation types on SMEs’ performance in the Cape Coast Metropolis of Ghana. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, 5(2), 110–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/2393957519857251
  • O’dwyer, M., Gilmore, A., & Carson, D. (2009). Innovative marketing in SMEs. European Journal of Marketing, 43(1–2), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560910923238
  • Ofosu-Boateng, I. (2020). Influence of consumer sales promotion on consumers’ purchasing behaviour of the retailing of consumer goods in Tema, Ghana. Journal Marketing Management, 8(1), 24–36.
  • Oloko, M., Anene, E. B., Kiara, P. G., Kathambi, I., & Mutulu, J. (2014). Marketing strategies for profitability: A case of Safaricom Ltd in Kenya Telecommunication Industry. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 4(5), 1–5.
  • OpenStax. (2023). Principles of marketing. OpenStax CNX. https://cnx.org/contents/ (Accessed 24 Sep. 2023).
  • Oppong, P. K., Oppong Mensah, N., & Berko, D. (2023). Word-of-mouth and willingness to pay (WTP) price premium: Mediating role of herbal brand credibility and brand trust in Ghana. Journal of African Business, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228916.2023.2277574
  • Osano, H. M. (2023). Global scaling by SMEs: Role of innovation and technology. Journal of the International Council for Small Business, 4(3), 258–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/26437015.2023.2201896
  • Osei, M. B., & Kagnicioglu, C. H. (2018). The impact of supply chain integration on firms’ business and operational performance at the food retail sector/industry. Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics, 5(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.804
  • Owusu, G. M. Y., Bekoe, R. A., Addo-Yobo, A. A., & Otieku, J. (2021). Mobile banking adoption among the Ghanaian youth. Journal of African Business, 22(3), 339–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228916.2020.1753003
  • Purchase, S., & Volery, T. (2020). Marketing innovation: A systematic review. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(9–10), 763–793. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2020.1774631
  • Quaye, D., & Mensah, I. (2019). Marketing innovation and sustainable competitive advantage of manufacturing SMEs in Ghana. Management Decision, 57(7), 1535–1553. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2017-0784
  • Raghubir, P., & Corfman, K. (1999). When do price promotions affect pretrial brand evaluations? Journal of Marketing Research, 36(2), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379903600206
  • Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press.
  • Sahoo, S. (2021). Impact of process quality management on firm’s operational performance: A mediation analysis of firm’s absorptive capacity. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 32(7), 1466–1492. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-07-2020-0281
  • Saleem, M., Khan, S. A., & Magd, H. (2022). Content marketing framework for building brand image: A case study of sohar international school, Oman. Building a brand image through electronic customer relationship management (pp. 64–83). IGI Global.
  • Sathana, V., Velnampy, T., & Rajumesh, S. (2021). Role of innovative marketing strategy for success of micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs). New horizons in management, leadership and sustainability: Innovative case studies and solutions for emerging economies (pp. 57–79). Springer International Publishing.
  • Schultz, D. E., & Block, M. P. (2014). Sales promotion influencing consumer brand preferences/purchases. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 31(3), 212–217. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-01-2014-0822
  • Scott, S. D., Plotnikoff, R. C., Karunamuni, N., Bize, R., & Rodgers, W. (2008). Factors influencing the adoption of an innovation: An examination of the uptake of the Canadian Heart Health Kit (HHK). Implementation Science, 3(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-3-41
  • Selase, A. M., Selase, A. E., Ayishetu, A. R., Comfort, A. D., Stanley, A., & Ebenezer, G. A. (2019). Impact of technology adoption and its utilization on SMEs in Ghana. International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises, 2(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.46281/ijsmes.v2i2.382
  • Serrasqueiro, Z., Leitão, J., & Smallbone, D. (2021). Small-and medium-sized enterprises (SME) growth and financing sources: Before and after the financial crisis. Journal of Management & Organization, 27(1), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2018.14
  • Shamsi, M. S., & Khan, M. A. (2018). Impact of sales promotion on consumer behavior: An analytical study of readymade garments and footwear segments. Al-Barkaat Journal of Finance & Management, 10(1), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.5958/2229-4503.2018.00008.5
  • Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52(3–4), 591–611. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591
  • Siaw, G. A., Martey, E., & Danquah, B. (2023). Effect of e-marketing on the brand image of hotels in Cape Coast, Ghana. Revista Turismo & Desenvolvimento (42), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.34624/rtd.v42i0.32667
  • Slater, S. F., Hult, G. T. M., & Olson, E. M. (2010). Factors influencing the relative importance of marketing strategy creativity and marketing strategy implementation effectiveness. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(4), 551–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2008.03.007
  • Sok, P., O’Cass, A., & Sok, K. M. (2013). Achieving superior SME performance: Overarching role of marketing, innovation, and learning capabilities. Australasian Marketing Journal, 21(3), 161–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2013.04.001
  • Solem, R. C. (2015). Limitation of a cross-sectional study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 148(2), 205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.05.006
  • Solomon, O. H., Allen, T., & Wangombe, W. (2023). Analysing the factors that influence social media adoption among SMEs in developing countries. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-023-00330-9
  • Stokes, D. (2000). Putting entrepreneurship into marketing: The processes of entrepreneurial marketing. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 2(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/14715200080001536
  • Storey, D. J. (1990). Firm performance and size. The economics of small firms: A European challenge (pp. 43–50). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Swaraj, M., & Dasgupta, T. (2021). Understanding promotion mix of special events’ success and customer satisfaction. Customer satisfaction. Adhyayan Publishers & Distributors.
  • Tan, P. J., & Bogomolova, S. (2016). A descriptive analysis of consumer’s price promotion literacy skills. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 44(12), 1223–1244. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-08-2015-0104
  • Thrassou, A., Uzunboylu, N., Vrontis, D., & Christofi, M. (2020). Digitalization of SMEs: A review of opportunities and challenges. The changing role of SMEs in global business: Volume II: Contextual evolution across markets, disciplines and sectors (pp. 179–200). Springer International Publishing.
  • Ting, I. W. K., Tebourbi, I., Lu, W. M., & Kweh, Q. L. (2021). The effects of managerial ability on firm performance and the mediating role of capital structure: Evidence from Taiwan. Financial Innovation, 7(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-021-00320-7
  • Ungerman, O., Dedkova, J., & Gurinova, K. (2018). The impact of marketing innovation on the competitiveness of enterprises in the context of industry 4.0. Journal of Competitiveness, 10(2), 132–148. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2018.02.09
  • Wang, Z. (2021). Social media brand posts and customer engagement. Journal of Brand Management, 28(6), 685–699. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-021-00247-5
  • Wang, P., Du, R., & Hu, Q. (2020). How to promote sales: Discount promotion or coupon promotion? Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 29(4), 381–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-020-5457-1
  • Yang, B., & Mattila, A. S. (2020). How rational thinking style affects sales promotion effectiveness. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 84, 102335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.102335
  • Yang, W., Zhang, L., & Mattila, A. S. (2016). Luxe for less: How do consumers react to luxury hotel price promotions? The moderating role of consumers’ need for status. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 57(1), 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938965515580133
  • Yohn, D. L. (2019). Why great innovation needs great marketing. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2019/02/why-great-innovation-needs-great-marketing (Accessed 23 September 2023).
  • Zeybek, Ö., & Ülengin, B. (2021). Sales promotion effectiveness: The impact of category–brand level price promotions on sales performance of a large retailer. International conference on intelligent and fuzzy systems (pp. 921–928). Springer International Publishing.
  • Zeybek, Ö., & Ülengin, B. (2022). The effect of sales promotions intensity on volume and variability in category sales of large retailers. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-021-00121-y