ABSTRACT
Suicide is a leading cause of death among youth, yet many risk reduction interventions have been designed for and tested with adults. The Safety Planning Intervention (SPI) is widely used by child-serving clinicians; however, little formal guidance exists about how to conduct the SPI in a developmentally tailored or family centered manner. This study aimed to 1) describe the content of youth safety plans to elucidate the range of strategies that youth find helpful in managing suicide risk, 2) apply operational definitions of SPI fidelity (completeness, personalization, consistency) developed with adults to SPI fidelity measurement with youth, and 3) explore the extent to which quality SPI implementation, including collaboration with parents, was related to parents’ perceived readiness and behavioral engagement in supportive behaviors following a psychiatric emergency. A mixed methods approach was used to examine safety plans completed by 54 youth ages 12–17 (79.6% female; 88.9% White) during a psychiatric emergency department visit. Common preferred coping strategies included listening to music, spending time with supportive individuals, creating art/music, and exercise. Youth safety plans were of moderate quality (M = 3.09, SD = 1.34, range = 0–5), with 61% demonstrating evidence of personalization and 35% mostly personalized. Parent ratings of developmentally appropriate and family centered care were associated with both perceived readiness (β = .67, p < .001) and behavioral engagement (β = .51, p = .003) with safety plan recommendations in the days following ED discharge. Implications of these findings for clinical practice are discussed.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank David Barbour, Kaylee Brown, Jonathan Martindale, and Eskira Kahsay for their support with data management and coding as well as the team of students who assisted with recruitment and data entry. We would also like to acknowledge the support of Patricia Smith of the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services and Brandon Johnson of SAMHSA. Finally, we thank the families who participated in this study as well as the clinicians who cared for them.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).