38
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Validity of a self-administered questionnaire, with reference to a clinical stress urinary incontinence test

, , &
Pages 148-153 | Received 30 Jan 2007, Published online: 09 Jul 2009
 

Abstract

Objective. To estimate the criterion validity of a self-administered questionnaire on urinary incontinence (UI) using a clinical stress UI test as reference. Material and methods. A total of 4710 women aged 20–59 years randomly selected from the municipalities of Aarhus and Randers (Denmark) participated in a population survey on UI. A sub-sample of 96 women stratified by the duration and frequency of UI answered an assisted, self-administered questionnaire concerning UI during the preceding 6 months. Subsequently, a clinical stress UI test was performed with the researchers being blinded with regard to the questionnaire information. Results. Based on the clinical stress test and questionnaire, 22 (22.7%) and 21 women (21.6%) had stress UI, respectively. UI occurring in more than drops and UI lasting for >4 weeks were found to be adequate predictors of UI (odds ratio 8.9 and 4.6; p<0.001 and p<0.05). Regarding all forms of UI, the agreement between the stress UI test result and the questionnaire data ranged from 51.0% to 77.1%. The probability of finding a positive stress UI test was 62% among women who answered that UI had lasted for >4 weeks and occurred in more than drops, compared to 22.9% in the total study group. The sensitivity and specificity of the stress UI test among women in whom UI lasted for >4 weeks and occurred in more than drops were 22.7% and 95.9%, respectively. Conclusions. These findings suggest that there is a greater probability of finding severe UI if the women have experienced it in more than drops and it has lasted for >4 weeks and it is therefore necessary to estimate the degree of incontinence further by means of a stress UI test. In contrast, women who experienced UI in less than drops and for a duration of <4 weeks only suffered from a very mild degree of UI.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.