424
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Use of Bakri balloon tamponade (BBT) for conservative management of postpartum haemorrhage: a tertiary referral centre case series

, &
Pages 66-70 | Received 07 Sep 2016, Accepted 15 Apr 2017, Published online: 06 Aug 2017
 

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of the Bakri balloon in the management of PPH. This was a retrospective review of 49 patients, who had Bakri balloon inserted for PPH in KK Hospital between April 2013 and December 2015. The main outcome measure was achievement of haemostasis by Bakri balloon tamponade (BBT). Our success rate was 81.6%. Out of the nine failures (18.0%), five (55.6%) had subtotal hysterectomies and four (44.4%) had total hysterectomies. The causes of PPH in these nine women were unsuspected or foci of placenta accreta (55.6%), uterine atony (33.3%) and retained products of conception (11.1%). Our study suggests that BBT is more likely to fail when bleeding is secondary to undiagnosed focal placenta accreta (p = .011) and when the estimated blood loss is more than 1.5 litres (p < .001). Our study adds to the growing body of evidence that BBT is not only effective for management of PPH in haemodynamically stable patients and in cases secondary to uterine atony and placenta praevia, but also in a small number of undiagnosed focal placenta accreta.

    Impact statement

  • There is limited evidence regarding efficacy of BBT for PPH.

  • Our study supports the use of BBT for PPH due to uterine atony and placenta praevia and in a small number of undiagnosed placenta accreta.

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Mr Ng Mor Jack and Miss Tey Wanshi for their contribution to the data analysis.

Disclosure statement

The authors indicated no potential conflicts of interest.

Ethics approval

Our study was approved by the Singhealth Centralised Insititutional Review Board (CRIB) before commencement of the study and the CRIB reference number is 2015/2622.

Additional information

Funding

None of the authors have received any funding or support from Cook Medical for the submitted work.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.