71
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Clinical indications referrals – what is the risk of premalignant and malignant female genital tract disease in women referred to a dedicated nurse-led colposcopy service? A retrospective cohort study

, , , , &
Pages 3644-3650 | Received 04 Apr 2022, Accepted 24 Nov 2022, Published online: 12 Dec 2022
 

Abstract

Post-coital bleeding (PCB) is a poor predictive factor for cancer and should not be managed as urgent referral. Urgent referral to colposcopy is justified however, in the presence of a visible suspicion of cervical cancer. This retrospective cohort study of women attending a clinical indications referral service aims to identify the risk of pre-malignant and malignant disease in women with clinical indication referrals to colposcopy. Thirty-seven of 3521 women (1%) were diagnosed with pre-malignant cervical or endometrial disease; 14 women (0.4%) were diagnosed with cancer (11 cervix, three endometrial). To detect one cancer in women referred with an abnormal cervix, one would need to see 70 women; to detect one cancer in women referred with PCB one would need to see 790 women. Improved education in primary care and obstetrics and gynaecology training is key to improving clinical indications referral services, which is otherwise an effective and efficient service.

    Impact Statement

  • What is already known on this subject? Post-coital bleeding is a poor predictive factor for cancer and should not be considered an urgent referral.

  • What do the results of this study add? The presence of a visible suspicion of cervical cancer however does warrant urgent referral as approximately one in 70 women will have a malignancy detected.

  • What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Improved education in primary care and obstetrics and gynaecology training is the key to improving clinical indications referral services

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Gynaecological Oncology and Colposcopy Department for their participation in this study.

We would also like to extend our gratitude to Lesley Mercer, lead administrator for Jessop Wing Colposcopy Unit.

Author contributions

Conception: JEP, RL, FEB and MCM.

Planning and development: JEP, MCM, AMG, RL and KE.

Data analysis: JEP, FEB and RL.

Initial draft of manuscript: JEP and FEB.

Manuscript writing, review and approval: FEB, JEP, MCM, AMG, RL, KE and AMG.

Ethical approval

This service review was registered with the Sheffield Teaching Hospital Clinical Audit Department.

Formal ethics approval was not required as this was an observational, retrospective study, as stipulated by the NHS Research Ethics Service.

Disclosure statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Additional information

Funding

None.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.