Abstract
Post-coital bleeding (PCB) is a poor predictive factor for cancer and should not be managed as urgent referral. Urgent referral to colposcopy is justified however, in the presence of a visible suspicion of cervical cancer. This retrospective cohort study of women attending a clinical indications referral service aims to identify the risk of pre-malignant and malignant disease in women with clinical indication referrals to colposcopy. Thirty-seven of 3521 women (1%) were diagnosed with pre-malignant cervical or endometrial disease; 14 women (0.4%) were diagnosed with cancer (11 cervix, three endometrial). To detect one cancer in women referred with an abnormal cervix, one would need to see 70 women; to detect one cancer in women referred with PCB one would need to see 790 women. Improved education in primary care and obstetrics and gynaecology training is key to improving clinical indications referral services, which is otherwise an effective and efficient service.
What is already known on this subject? Post-coital bleeding is a poor predictive factor for cancer and should not be considered an urgent referral.
What do the results of this study add? The presence of a visible suspicion of cervical cancer however does warrant urgent referral as approximately one in 70 women will have a malignancy detected.
What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Improved education in primary care and obstetrics and gynaecology training is the key to improving clinical indications referral services
Impact Statement
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Gynaecological Oncology and Colposcopy Department for their participation in this study.
We would also like to extend our gratitude to Lesley Mercer, lead administrator for Jessop Wing Colposcopy Unit.
Author contributions
Conception: JEP, RL, FEB and MCM.
Planning and development: JEP, MCM, AMG, RL and KE.
Data analysis: JEP, FEB and RL.
Initial draft of manuscript: JEP and FEB.
Manuscript writing, review and approval: FEB, JEP, MCM, AMG, RL, KE and AMG.
Ethical approval
This service review was registered with the Sheffield Teaching Hospital Clinical Audit Department.
Formal ethics approval was not required as this was an observational, retrospective study, as stipulated by the NHS Research Ethics Service.
Disclosure statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Data availability statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.