Publication Cover
Orbit
The International Journal on Orbital Disorders, Oculoplastic and Lacrimal Surgery
Volume 41, 2022 - Issue 4
139
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Investigation

Upper eyelid weighting for lagophthalmos results in contralateral upper eyelid elevation

, &
Pages 464-468 | Received 08 Jan 2021, Accepted 22 Jun 2021, Published online: 06 Jul 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Introduction

Upper eyelid weighting decreases lagophthalmos by improving blink dynamics. The effect of weighting on static eyelid position is less well understood. This study describes the effect of upper eyelid weighting on ipsilateral and contralateral upper eyelid position.

Methods

Patients with unilateral lagophthalmos who underwent upper eyelid weight implantation were included. Primary outcome measures were ipsilateral and contralateral margin to reflex distance 1 (MRD1), preoperatively and postoperatively. MRD1 symmetry was assessed as a secondary outcome measure. Weight mass was examined as a covariate of MRD1 change.

Results

23 patients (16 female, 7 male) met inclusion criteria. After weighting, contralateral MRD1 increased from mean [SD] 2.91 [1.41] mm to 3.77 [1.75] mm (p < .05). Ipsilateral (weighted) MRD1 did not significantly change (2.64 [1.41] mm to 2.40 [1.18] mm, p = .11). Preoperatively, paretic and normal side MRD1 were not different (p = .52). Postoperatively, weighted and unweighted MRD1 were significantly different (p < .05). Weight mass was not a covariate of MRD1 change, neither ipsilateral nor contralateral (p = .76, p = .71, respectively). The proportion of patients with MRD1 asymmetry ≥ 1 mm preoperatively (12/23, 52.2%) did not change following surgery (17/23, 73.9%, p = .12).

Conclusion

Weight insertion led to contralateral eyelid elevation, a manifestation of Hering’s law. Weight mass did not impact the magnitude of MRD1 change, and the proportion of patients with MRD1 asymmetry ≥ 1 mm did not change following surgery. These findings may guide surgeons in their preoperative planning and in counseling of patients.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the article.

Proprietary interest statement

All authors report no conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Additional information

Funding

This work is supported by an Unrestricted Grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc. to the Department of Ophthalmology at UCLA.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.