Publication Cover
Orbit
The International Journal on Orbital Disorders, Oculoplastic and Lacrimal Surgery
Volume 41, 2022 - Issue 6
272
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Investigation

Hughes flap in the management of lower lid retraction

, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 733-738 | Received 25 May 2021, Accepted 08 Nov 2021, Published online: 23 Dec 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Purpose

We present a retrospective case series on the use of Hughes flap in managing acquired cicatricial lower lid retraction.

Methods

This was a multicentre, retrospective case series. Data was collected from medical records across different sites within Australia (Adelaide, Melbourne, and Sydney) and New Zealand (Hamilton).

Results

Fourteen patients were identified. The aetiology of cicatricial lower lid retraction included previous lid lesion excision and reconstruction, eyelid trauma, orbital fracture repair, orbital radiotherapy, and lateral canthal dystopia from previous lid surgeries. 4/14 (29%) cases had undergone other surgery to correct the retraction prior to the Hughes flap. Pre-operative lagophthalmos due to lower lid retraction was noted in 11/14 (79%) cases with a median 2 mm (range: 1–5 mm). Exposure keratopathy was present in 7/14 (50%) cases. There were no peri-operative complications during Hughes flap reconstruction. One patient had post-operative upper eyelid retraction that did not require any further intervention. One patient had persistent lagophthalmos and exposure keratopathy that is being managed conservatively. One patient had wound dehiscence and further lid retraction following flap division, which required further surgery. Median length of follow-up was 15 months (range: 0.5–84 months). At final review, improvement or resolution of symptoms was seen in 13/14 (93%) cases.

Conclusions

A Hughes flap is an effective surgical technique for the management of cicatricial lower lid retraction.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed on the publisher’s website.

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported that there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.