Tear instability in the fellow eye of unilateral nasolacrimal obstruction and resolution with dacryocystorhinostomy

ABSTRACT

Purpose

To determine the effect of unilateral primary acquired nasolacrimal obstruction (PANDO) on ocular surface parameters in PANDOeyes and fellow eyes and changes in these parameters after dacryocystorhinostomy.

Methods

Tear osmolarity, tear break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer’s test, Meibomian gland score, and Lissamine Green staining of PANDO eyes and fellow eyes were measured preoperatively and postoperatively at Day 15, 1 month, and 3 months. Lacrimal irrigation and epiphora symptomatology were evaluated at all follow-up visits, and patients who did not meet surgical success criteria were excluded from the study.

Results

Twenty-nine patients who underwent successful dacryocystorhinostomy surgery were included in the study. Preoperative and postoperative Day 15 Schirmer (p = .019, p = .001) and TBUT (p = .039, p = .043) were significantly lower in the fellow eye compared to PANDO eyes. The differences observed between PANDO eyes and fellow eyes in all other parameters were not significant (p > .05). Preoperatively PANDO eye parameters were normal, whereas TBUT (7.59 ± 5.39 s) and tear osmolarity (308.59 ± 17.32 mOsm/L) values of the fellow eye may be indicative of tear film instability. TBUT and tear osmolarity of the fellow eye showed significant improvement 3 months postoperatively compared to preoperative values (p = .010; p = .027 respectively).

Conclusion

Schirmer and TBUT values of the fellow eye were significantly lower than PANDO eyes preoperatively, one month after surgery there was no significant difference.

TBUT and tear osmolarity of the fellow eyes may be indicative of tear instability preoperatively with improvement 3 months after dacryocystorhinostomy.

KEYWORDS:

• Dacryocystorhinostomy
• lacrimal functional unit
• nasolacrimal duct obstruction
• ocular surface
• tear film instability

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the article.

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.