Pituitary apoplexy: retrospective review of 30 patients—is surgical intervention always necessary?

Abstract

The objective of this article is to review clinical outcomes in patients presenting with pituitary apoplexy and compare the results of conservative and surgical management. It took the form of a retrospective review of 30 patients (23M, 7F; age range: 17 – 86 years) with pituitary apoplexy diagnosed between 1988 and 2004. Presenting features included headache in 27 patients, ‘collapse’ in three and vomiting in 14. Complete blindness occurred in four patients, monocular blindness in two, decreased visual acuity in 12, visual field loss in 10 and ophthalmoplegia in 15. Only five had no initial visual deficit. CT was the initial mode of imaging in 22 patients: three such scans were initially reported as ‘normal’ and a further 10 as pituitary tumour only, with no haemorrhage. Ten patients proceeded to early pituitary surgery and 20 were managed conservatively. There was one death 24 days after admission in a patient with multiple co-morbidities. Of the six patients with blindness, three (two conservatively treated) regained partial vision. Of the remaining 19 patients with visual deficits, 10 (two surgically treated) recovered fully and eight (four surgically treated) partly so. At latest follow-up the following pituitary hormone deficiencies were identified: ACTH 19; TSH 20; testosterone 18; ADH (diabetes insipidus) eight. Later recurrence of a pituitary adenoma was observed in seven cases (including six of the 10 surgically treated patients). There was no evidence that those patients managed surgically had a better outcome. Early neurosurgical intervention may not be required in most patients presenting with pituitary apoplexy.

Key words:

• Pituitary apoplexy
• pituitary tumour
• pituitary surgery
• vision
• conservative treatment