255
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

The impact of major trauma centre implementation on the pathways and outcome of traumatic intracranial extradural haematoma in a regional centre

, , , , , & show all
Pages 541-544 | Received 18 Sep 2015, Accepted 02 May 2016, Published online: 24 May 2016
 

Abstract

Introduction: A new trauma care system with regional major trauma centres (MTC) was implemented on 1st April 2012 across England. We aimed to assess whether this has affected the referral pathways and mortality of patients undergoing emergency craniotomy for extradural haematoma (EDH), where clinical outcome is correlated with the time to intervention.

Materials and methods: This was a retrospective cohort comparison study. All patients who had undergone evacuation of EDH from January 2011 to December 2013 were identified. Only those in whom a decision for emergency craniotomy had been made at the time of referral to the on-call neurosurgeon were included. The CRASH predicted risk of mortality was calculated for individual patients. Mortality was assessed at 14 days in order to compute standardised mortality ratios (SMR).

Results: Overall, 65 patients underwent EDH evacuation during the study period (21 pre-MTC and 44 post-MTC). Of those, 43 emergency procedures according to the aforementioned definition were included for further analysis (13 pre-MTC, 30 post-MTC). The mean CRASH predicted risk of mortality was 0.21 for the pre-MTC cohort (95% CI: 0.07–0.34) and 0.094 for the post-MTC cohort (95% CI: 0.039–0.15; p = 0.052). There was no significant difference in the rate of secondary transfers before and after MTC implementation (9/13 vs. 23/30, p = 0.71). The mean interval from referral to operation was 198 min for the pre-MTC cohort (95% CI: 123–273) and 201 min for the post-MTC cohort (95% CI: 141–262; p = 0.95). The SMR was 0.37 for the pre-MTC cohort (95% CI: 0.02–1.81; 1 death) and 0.71 for the post-MTC cohort (95% CI: 0.12–2.34; 2 deaths).

Conclusions: MTC implementation has not affected the time to operation or the mortality following EDH evacuation.

Acknowledgements

PJH is supported by a NIHR Research Professorship and the NIHR Cambridge BRC.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.