366
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Validation and accuracy of intraoperative CT scan using the Philips AlluraXper FD20 angiography suite for assessment of spinal instrumentation

, , , , , & show all
Pages 741-746 | Received 28 Sep 2015, Accepted 29 Jan 2017, Published online: 10 Mar 2017
 

Abstract

Background: With the concept of the hybrid operating room gaining popularity, the authors adapted a hybrid angiographic suite with intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) to evaluate accuracy of pedicle screw placement in spinal fusion. This retrospective review examines how well iCT detected extrapedicular screw violation, to then allow repositioning and potentially avoid revision surgery.

Methods: A total of 36 consecutive patients underwent pedicle screw placement in posterior cervical, thoracic, and lumbosacral spinal fusions. All patients underwent iCT in the Philips AlluraXper FD20 angiography suite in the lumbar spine XperCT mode and postoperative conventional computed tomography (CT) scanning. Primary endpoints included the sensitivity and specificity of iCT in detecting pedicular violation characterized as minor, moderate, or severe when compared with postoperative CT. Secondary endpoint included the incidence of replaced screws during surgery and number of revision surgeries.

Results: Of 241 screws placed in 16 males and 20 females, iCT detected severe pedicle violation in 25 screws (10.4%); 16 screws were then repositioned during surgery. Sensitivity and specificity of iCT to detect severe screw malposition were 92.3% and 99.1%, respectively. No revision surgeries were performed in this series.

Conclusions: In our series, iCT had high sensitivity and specificity in detecting severe screw malposition. As a valuable adjunct for intraoperative assessment of pedicle screw position, immediate intraoperative correction of misplaced screws then eliminated any revision surgery for our patients.

Acknowledgements

This study was conducted under the general approval the Federal Commission of experts on professional secrecy related to medical research. Nr. 035.0003-17/18.

All persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study.

Disclosure statement

There are no conflicts of interest to be reported for any author.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.