Abstract
Introduction
Radiotherapy-induced glioblastomas (RIGB) are a well-known late and rare complication of brain irradiation. Yet the clinical, radiological and molecular characteristics of these tumors are not well characterized.
Methods
This was a retrospective multicentre study that analysed adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma over a 10-year period. Patients with RIGB were identified according to Cahan’s criteria for radiation-induced tumors. A case-control analysis was performed to compare known prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) with an independent cohort of IDH-1 wildtype de novo glioblastomas treated with standard temozolomide chemoradiotherapy. Survival analysis was performed by Cox proportional hazards regression.
Results
A total of 590 adult patients were diagnosed with glioblastoma. 19 patients (3%) had RIGB. The mean age of patients upon diagnosis was 48 years ± 15. The mean latency duration from radiotherapy to RIGB was 14 years ± 8. The mean total dose was 58Gy ± 10. One-third of patients (37%, 7/19) had nasopharyngeal cancer and a fifth (21%, 4/19) had primary intracranial germinoma. Compared to a cohort of 146 de novo glioblastoma patients, RIGB patients had a shorter median OS of 4.8 months versus 19.2 months (p-value: <.001). Over a third of RIGBs involved the cerebellum (37%, 7/19) and was higher than the control group (4%, 6/146; p-value: <.001). A fifth of RIGBs (21%, 3/19) were pMGMT methylated which was significantly fewer than the control group (49%, 71/146; p-value: .01). For RIGB patients (32%, 6/19) treated with re-irradiation, the one-year survival rate was 67% and only 8% for those without such treatment (p-value: .007).
Conclusion
The propensity for RIGBs to develop in the cerebellum and to be pMGMT unmethylated may contribute to their poorer prognosis. When possible re-irradiation may offer a survival benefit. Nasopharyngeal cancer and germinomas accounted for the majority of original malignancies reflecting their prevalence among Southern Chinese.
Disclosure statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.