2,881
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Articles

The use of augmented reality in transsphenoidal surgery: A systematic review

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 457-471 | Received 30 Dec 2021, Accepted 20 Mar 2022, Published online: 08 Apr 2022
 

Abstract

Background

Augmented reality (AR) has become a promising tool in neurosurgery. It can minimise the anatomical challenges faced by conventional endoscopic or microscopic transsphenoidal reoperations and can assist in intraoperative guidance, preoperative planning, and surgical training.

Objectives

The aims of this systematic review are to describe, compare, and evaluate the use of AR in endoscopic and microscopic transsphenoidal surgery, incorporating the latest primary research.

Methods

A systematic review was performed to explore and evaluate existing primary evidence for using AR in transsphenoidal surgery. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE and EMBASE was conducted from database inception to 11th August 2021 for primary data on the use of AR in microscopic and endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. Additional articles were identified through searches on PubMed, Google Scholar, JSTOR, SCOPUS, Web of Science, Engineering Village, IEEE transactions, and HDAS. A synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) analysis was employed quantitatively and qualitatively on the impact of AR on landmark identification, intraoperative navigation, accuracy, time, surgeon experience, and patient outcomes.

Results

In this systematic review, 17 studies were included in the final analysis. The main findings were that AR provides a convincing improvement to landmark identification, intraoperative navigation, and surgeon experience in transsphenoidal surgery, with a further positive effect on accuracy and time. It did not demonstrate a convincing positive effect on patient outcomes. No studies reported comparative mortalities, morbidities, or cost-benefit indications.

Conclusion

AR-guided transsphenoidal surgery, both endoscopic and microscopic, is associated with an overall improvement in the areas of intraoperative guidance and surgeon experience as compared with their conventional counterparts. However, literature on this area, particularly comparative data and evidence, is very limited. More studies with similar methodologies and quantitative outcomes are required to perform appropriate meta-analyses and to draw significant conclusions.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare that they have no financial or other interest relating to products, distributors, or manufacturers associated with the following review study. All authors declare no conflict of interest in the pursuit of this study. All authors participated in the coordination and drafting of this text. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.