![Sample our Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing & Allied Health journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5944/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Medicine-Dentistry-Nursing-Allied-Health.jpg"})
ABSTRACT
Introduction: A consensus statement proposed a diagnostic framework to systematise the identification of paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity (PSH) using the PSH-Assessment Measure (PSH-AM).
Methods: This retrospective study identified adult patients with a primary diagnosis of traumatic brain injury and a hospital length of stay >14 days. Based on PSH-AM scores, patients were grouped into ‘unlikely’, ‘possible’, or ‘probable’ PSH. For this study, ‘possible’ and ‘probable’ PSH patients were collapsed into a single group (PSH+), and resultant data were compared with ‘unlikely’ diagnoses (PSH-). PSH-AM data were assessed against clinical diagnoses to establish sensitivity and specificity data.
Results: Sixty five patients met inclusion criteria, with 45/65 (69%) categorised as either ‘possible’ or ‘probable’ PSH on the PSH-AM. Only 16 of these patients were diagnosed by clinicians. The most common symptoms triggering clinical diagnosis were tachycardia, fever and posturing. Increased respiratory rate, blood pressure or the presence of diaphoresis were not used in diagnosing PSH if the PSH-AM was not utilised. Assuming clinical assessment as the current gold standard, the PSH-AM yielded a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 35% when used retrospectively. Patients clinically diagnosed with PSH were discharged 5 days earlier compared to those identified by the PSH-AM.
Conclusions: The recently proposed diagnostic framework may reduce misdiagnosis, length of stay and hospitalisation costs.
Acknowledgements
We thank Sherouk Sharaf, Ghazaleh Ranjbar and Gin Yau for assisting us with acquisition of data.
Conflict of interest
Sophie Samuel, Monica Lee, Robert J Brown, H Alex Choi and Ian J Baguley declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Sophie Samuel
S Samuel: study concept and design, analysis and interpretation, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.
Monica Lee
M Lee: acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.
Robert J Brown
R Brown: analysis and interpretation, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.
Huimahn A. Choi
H Choi: analysis and interpretation, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.
Ian J Baguley
I Baguley: analysis and interpretation, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content