279
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Comparing learning performance on the open trial selective reminding test with the California verbal learning test II in traumatic brain injury

, , , &
Pages 245-252 | Received 15 Mar 2019, Accepted 26 Oct 2019, Published online: 03 Nov 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Learning and memory deficits are prevalent following moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), affecting between 54% and 84% of impacted individuals.

Objective: The current study examined learning performance on two tests of verbal memory: the OT-SRT and the CVLT-II.

Methods: Sixty-eight participants with TBI performed the OT-SRT and the CVLT-II on two different days. Additionally, all participants completed cognitive tests assessing processing speed, working memory and executive functions. By definition, all participants with TBI were identified as having impaired learning on the OT-SRT, however only 38 were also identified as impaired on the CVLT-II. The sample was thus divided into two groups, those who failed both tests (Fail-2) and those who failed only the OT-SRT (Fail-1).

Results: The Failed-1 group showed significantly better performance in processing speed, working memory and executive functions compared to the Fail-2 group. On the CVLT-II, the Fail-1 group performed significantly better on the number of words recalled on trials 1 and 5 compared to the Fail-2 group. Both groups performed similarly the OT-SRT.

Discussion: The CVLT-II and the OT-SRT are not equivalent tests and should not be used interchangeably.

Declaration of Interests

The authors report no declarations of interest. The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The contents of this article were developed under the NIDRR Grant H133A070037. However, these contents do not necessarily represent the policy of the Department of Education, and endorsement by the Federal Government should not be assumed.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research [H133A120030].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.