466
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Pharmacotherapy

Randomized, dose-ranging study of a fluticasone propionate multidose dry powder inhaler in adolescents and adults with uncontrolled asthma not previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids

, MD, , MS, , PhD & , MD
Pages 89-98 | Received 29 Jan 2016, Accepted 22 May 2016, Published online: 01 Nov 2016
 

ABSTRACT

Objective: A novel, inhalation-driven, multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) eliminates the need to coordinate actuation with inhalation. To characterize dose response, efficacy, and safety of fluticasone propionate (Fp) MDPI, a dose-ranging study was conducted with placebo and active comparators. Methods: This 12-week, double-blind, parallel-group study randomized patients aged ≥12 years with uncontrolled persistent asthma not previously treated with inhaled corticosteroid therapy (N = 622) to twice-daily treatment with Fp MDPI (12.5, 25, 50, or 100 µg), placebo MDPI, or open-label Fp dry powder inhaler (DPI) 100 µg. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline over 12 weeks in trough (morning pre-dose and pre-rescue bronchodilator) forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). Blood samples were collected from a patient subset to evaluate pharmacokinetics. Adverse events were monitored. Results: Fp MDPI 25, 50, and 100 µg significantly improved change from baseline in trough FEV1 over 12 weeks compared with placebo (p < 0.01). There were no substantial differences in FEV1 change from baseline over 12 weeks between any Fp MDPI dose and Fp DPI 100 µg. Maximum observed concentration (Cmax) of Fp increased with increasing Fp MDPI doses; time of Cmax was similar across doses and treatments. Systemic exposures for Fp MDPI 25 and 50 µg were lower than that for Fp DPI 100 µg. The safety profile of Fp MDPI was consistent with that of Fp DPI. Conclusions: In this study, Fp MDPI 25 and 50 µg provided comparable efficacy and safety to Fp DPI 100 µg, with lower systemic exposure.

Acknowledgements

Medical writing assistance was provided by Lisa Feder, PhD, of Peloton Advantage and was funded by Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. Teva provided a full review of the article.

Declaration of interest

Dr. Kerwin has served on advisory boards and speaker panels for and has received travel reimbursement from Amphastar, AstraZeneca (Pearl), Forest, Ironwood, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, Sunovion, Targacept, Teva, and Theravance. He has conducted multicenter clinical research trials for approximately 40 pharmaceutical companies. Dr. Song and Mr. Gillespie are employees of Teva Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Steinfeld was a full-time employee of Teva Pharmaceuticals during study conduct and analysis.

Funding

This study was sponsored by Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.