Intertester reliability of shoulder complaints diagnoses in primary health care

Abstract

Objective: Shoulder complaints are frequently encountered in general practice, but precise diagnosing is challenging. This study investigated agreement of shoulder complaints diagnoses between clinicians in a primary health care setting.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: Four primary health care clinicians used patients’ history and functional examination of the shoulder by selective tissue tension techniques (STTs), to diagnose shoulder complaints.

Subjects: 62 patients, aged 18–75 years.

Main outcome measure: Reliability of diagnoses was assessed by observed intertester agreement and Cohen’s kappa. A total of 372 diagnostic pairs were available for intertester comparisons.

Results: Six diagnoses were assigned by all clinicians; supraspinatus-, infraspinatus-, subscapularis-tendinopathies; chronic subacromial bursitis; glenohumeral capsulitis, and acromioclavicular joint lesion. The observed agreement on these diagnoses ranged from 0.84 for glenohumeral capsulitis to 0.97 for acromioclavicular joint lesion. Kappa scores were 0.46 (95% CI 0.33, 0.58) for chronic subacromial bursitis; 0.53 (95% CI 0.34, 0.68), 0.59 (95% CI 0.47, 0.70), and 0.68 (95% CI 0.53, 0.82) for infraspinatus -, supraspinatus -, and subscapularis-tendinopathy, respectively. For glenohumeral capsulitis and acromioclavicular lesion kappa scores were 0.66 (95% CI 0.57, 0.73) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.61, 0.90). Kappa scores were higher for individual diagnoses than for individual tests, except for limitation in passive abduction (0.70, 95% CI 0.62, 0.78) and passive lateral rotation (0.66, 95% CI 0.57, 0.73).

Conclusions: Although experienced clinicians showed substantial intertester agreement, precise diagnoses of shoulder complaints in primary health care remain a challenge. The present results call for further research on refined diagnoses of shoulder complaints.

Key points

•   Based on medical history and a systematic functional examination by selective tissue tension techniques (STTs), we investigated the agreement of shoulder complaints diagnoses across four primary health care clinicians and 62 patients.

• • Agreements on diagnoses were generally better than the agreement on individual tests.

• • Good kappa scores were obtained for the diagnoses glenohumeral capsulitis, rotator cuff tendinopathy, and acromioclavicular lesion.

• • Further research is necessary to investigate the diagnostic validity of functional shoulder examination by the STTs method.

Keywords:

• Cyriax
• general practice
• Norway
• orthopaedic medicine
• selective tissue tension techniques
• shoulder complaints
• shoulder diagnosis
• shoulder pain
• Sweden

Acknowledgements

We are thankful for the clinicians who referred the shoulder patients to our study, to the patients who willingly were examined four times, and to the clinicians (Andersson Thomas, Gustavsson Tomas, Ingemann Are, and Røsand Tom) for sharing their clinical skills with us during two intensive days.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Data Protection Official for Research. The regional ethics committee considered the study to be outside their assignment.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding information

The project was funded by grants from UiT the Arctic University of Norway.