https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2707-8451
![Sample our Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing & Allied Health journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5944/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Medicine-Dentistry-Nursing-Allied-Health.jpg"})
Abstract
Background and objective
Mental health issues are common among patients with chronic physical conditions. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of the Healthy Mind intervention, a general practice-based programme that provides problem-solving therapy (PST) to patients with poor mental well-being and type 2 diabetes (T2D) and/or ischaemic heart disease (IHD).
Design and setting
A one-arm feasibility study was conducted in three general practices in the Central Denmark Region.
Intervention
Eight healthcare providers from the included general practices underwent a two-day course to acquire PST skills. Screening for poor mental health was carried out at the annual chronic care consultation for T2D or IHD, and PST sessions were offered to patients on indication of poor mental health. Nine patients received PST.
Methods
Semi-structured interviews with eight healthcare providers and six patients were conducted. Data were analysed deductively focusing on appropriateness, acceptability and fidelity of the intervention.
Results
The intervention was considered appropriate for the patient group and the general practice setting. The providers acknowledged PST as a valuable tool for managing psychological issues in general practice, and the patients perceived PST as an effective and tangible treatment. Since practice nurses’ schedules were generally better suited for longer consultations, they were often the preferred intervention providers. The intervention was largely delivered as intended. However, the GPs generally expected patients to prefer a more directive approach, which sometimes challenged their role as facilitator and guide.
Conclusion
The Healthy Mind intervention was found to be feasible, and the results support proceeding to a full-scale evaluation trial.
Key Points
Patients with type 2 diabetes and/or ischaemic heart disease often experience poor mental well-being, revealing a shortage of general practice-based interventions targeting this issue.
This study evaluates the feasibility of a problem-solving therapy intervention in general practice for patients with poor mental health and type 2 diabetes and/or chronic ischemic heart disease.
Both patients and healthcare providers regarded problem-solving therapy as an acceptable intervention for managing psychological issues in general practice.
Healthcare providers preferred practice nurses as the providers of problem-solving therapy since their schedules were often more suitable for longer consultations.
In problem-solving therapy, the provider is expected to take a facilitating and guiding role, but GPs sometimes struggled remaining in this role due to a preconceived anticipation that patients expected them to take a more directive approach.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).