Summary
2009, Vol. 48, No. 7, Pages 948-954 , DOI 10.1080/02841860903124648

Genetic variants in association studies – review of strengths and weaknesses in study design and current knowledge of impact on cancer risk

Ulrika Andersson1, Roberta McKean-Cowdin2, Ulf Hjalmars3, Beatrice Malmer1*
1Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology Umeå University, Sweden
2Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
3Department of Clinical Sciences, Pediatrics Umeå University, Sweden
*Correspondence: Beatrice Malmer, Department of Radiation Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, 901 87, Sweden +46 907851359 +46 907852031



Sequencing of the human genome has recently been completed and mapping of the complete genomic variation is ongoing. During the last decade there has been a huge expansion of studies of genetic variants, both with respect to association studies of disease risk and for studies of genetic factors of prognosis and treatments response, i.e., pharmacogenomics. The use of genetics to predict a patient's risk of disease or treatment response is one step toward an improved personalised prevention and screening modality for the prevention of cancer and treatment selection. The technology and statistical methods for completing whole genome tagging of variants and genome wide association studies has developed rapidly over the last decade. After identifying the genetic loci with the strongest, statistical associations with disease risk, future studies will need to further characterise the genotype-phenotype relationship to provide a biological basis for prevention and treatment decisions according to genetic profile. This review discusses some of the general issues and problems of study design; we also discuss challenges in conducting valid association studies in rare cancers such as paediatric brain tumours, where there is support for genetic susceptibility but difficulties in assembling large sample sizes. The clinical interpretation and implementation of genetic association studies with respect to disease risk and treatment is not yet well defined and remains an important area of future research.

Full Text | PDF (128 KB) | PDF Plus (129 KB)


Users who read this article also read:

Tumor-associated epilepsy and glioma: Are there common genetic pathways?
Shala Ghaderi Berntsson, Beatrice Malmer, Melissa L. Bondy, Mingqi Qu, Anja Smits
Acta Oncologica, Jan 2009, Vol. 48, No. 7, Pages 955-963.
Summary | Full Text | PDF (204 KB) | PDF Plus (204 KB) | Add to Favorites | Related 
Does enhanced information at cancer genetic counseling improve counselees’ knowledge, risk perception, satisfaction and negotiation of information to at-risk relatives? – a randomized study
Afsaneh Hayat Roshanai, Richard Rosenquist, Claudia Lampic, Karin Nordin
Acta Oncologica, Jan 2009, Vol. 48, No. 7, Pages 999-1009.
Summary | Full Text | PDF (97 KB) | PDF Plus (98 KB) | Add to Favorites | Related 
 

Prev. Article | Next Article
View/Print PDF (128 KB)
View PDF Plus (129 KB)
Add to favourite
Email to a friend
TOC Alert | Citation Alert What is RSS?

 
 
Quick Search
for 
Authors:
Ulrika Andersson
Roberta McKean-Cowdin
Ulf Hjalmars
Beatrice Malmer