1,077
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Cardiovascular

Modeling the impact of real-world adherence to once-daily (QD) versus twice-daily (BID) non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants on stroke and major bleeding events among non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 653-660 | Received 06 Jul 2018, Accepted 21 Sep 2018, Published online: 30 Oct 2018
 

Abstract

Objectives: To estimate the real-world (RW) impact of adherence to once-daily (QD: rivaroxaban and edoxaban) and twice-daily (BID: apixaban and dabigatran) non-vitamin K antagonist (NOACs) on the risk of stroke and major bleeding (MB) among non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients.

Methods: First, claims from the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart database (July 2012–December 2016) were analyzed. Adult NVAF patients with ≥2 NOAC dispensings (index date) were included. The relationship between NOAC adherence (proportion of days covered ≥80%) and stroke/MB 1-year post-index was evaluated using adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. Second, the natural logarithm of hazard ratios (HRs) was multiplied to a literature-derived mean adherence difference between QD and BID NOACs yielding stroke and MB rates. Third, these rates were multiplied by 1-year Kaplan-Meier rates of stroke and MB which yielded the number of strokes prevented and MBs caused. Annual cost savings were evaluated using literature-based stroke ($81,414/patient) and MB ($63,905/patient) cost estimates.

Results: In total, 54,280 patients were included. HRs for adherent vs non-adherent patients were 0.67 (p < .001) for stroke and 1.09 (p = .179) for MB. The claims-derived 1-year Kaplan-Meier rates were 3.0% and 3.4% for strokes and MBs, respectively. For 100,000 AF patients, 64 strokes were prevented (p < .001), and a non-significant number of MBs (n = 15, p < .191) were caused by QD vs BID NOACs annually, which leads to cost savings estimated at $58 million for QD NOACs.

Conclusion: QD NOACs prevented a significant number of strokes and caused no significant increase in MBs compared to BID NOACs, which leads to significant net cost savings for NVAF patients in the US.

Transparency

Declaration of financial/other relationships

V.A. and C.C. are employees of Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC. J.S. was an employee of Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC at the time of the study. F.L., G.G., N.S., and P.L. are employees of Groupe d’analyse, Ltée, a consulting company that has received research grants from Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC. C.A.M. is an employee of Evidera, a consulting company that has received research grants from Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC. E.D.P. has received research grants from Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC. CMRO peer reviewers have no financial/other interests to disclose.

Acknowledgments

Medical writing assistance was provided by Samuel Rochette, an employee of Analysis Group, Inc.

Additional information

Funding

This manuscript was funded by Janssen Scientific Affairs.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.