100
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Anti‐CCP2 is an adjunct to, not a surrogate for, rheumatoid factor in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis: diagnostic utility of anti‐CCP2 antibodies in Egyptian patients with rheumatoid arthritis

, , &
Pages 329-336 | Accepted 09 Apr 2008, Published online: 12 Jul 2009
 

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the diagnostic utility of the second generation of anti‐cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti‐CCP2) antibodies versus rheumatoid factor (RF) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to study the association between anti‐CCP2 and RA disease parameters.

Methods: Fifty consecutive Egyptian patients with RA, 37 patients with other rheumatic diseases, and 10 healthy controls were recruited for testing for anti‐CCP2 and immunoglobulin M (IgM) rheumatoid factor (RF). Assessment measures included the Disease Activity Score (DAS28) for disease activity, the Health Assessment Questionnaire – Disability Index (HAQ‐DI) for disability and the Short Erosion Narrowing Score (SENS) for radiological damage.

Results: The sensitivities of anti‐CCP2 and IgM‐RF in RA patients were 70% and 52%, with specificities of 91.5% and 89.4%, respectively. There was 73.2% agreement between anti‐CCP2 and RF for all groups tested (κ = 0.42, p<0.001) but agreement was only 66% for RA patients (κ = 0.31, p<0.05). Anti‐CCP2 had superior diagnostic properties [sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV)] than RF, but using both RF and anti‐CCP2 enhanced the sensitivity to 78%, when either test was positive, and the specificity to 100%, with a PPV of 1, when both tests were positive. Anti‐CCP2 titre was significantly correlated with disease severity [rheumatoid nodules, rheumatoid factor (RF), and radiological damage] and HAQ‐DI (p<0.05) but not with parameters of disease activity.

Conclusion: Anti‐CCP2 has superior diagnostic and prognostic properties in RA compared with RF. It should not replace RF as a serological test; however, since using both tests modestly increases sensitivity and markedly enhances specificity, so that diagnosis of RA is highly probable when both tests are positive.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.