Revitalization and Digital Preservation of Indigenous Knowledge Systems for Sustainable Development of Indigenous Communities in South Africa

ABSTRACT

South Africa has been regarded as one of the African countries with rich in culture and repository of knowledge referred to as indigenous knowledge. This knowledge is a significant resource which could contribute to the sustainability development of rural communities and society at large. Given that this valuable knowledge is irreplaceable, its promotion and protection is critical. Digital preservation has become a popular method for revitalization and safeguarding indigenous knowledge in recent years. The purpose of this study was to determine how digital preservation can be used in enhancing long-term access to indigenous knowledge for sustainable development of indigenous communities in South Africa. This study used literature review to investigate strategies being established in South Africa and different parts of the world to revitalize and digitally preserve indigenous knowledge for the benefits of indigenous communities. This study established that indigenous knowledge owners and their communities do not have mechanisms and policy being put in place for effective digital preservation of their indigenous knowledge. The study thus recommends that anticolonial strategies and policy in the protection of indigenous knowledge systems be implemented and be the subject of a real training and awareness raising programme for community members.

KEYWORDS:

• Digital preservation
• indigenous knowledge systems
• indigenous knowledge owners
• indigenous communities
• revitalization
• sustainable development

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1. Solmaz Forutnani, Mohsen Nowkarizi, Mohammad Reza Kiani, and Hamid Reza Mokhtari Aski, “The Role of Rural Libraries in Preserving the Indigenous Knowledge of Rural Residents: The Case of South Khorasan Province,” World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development 15, no. 3 (2018): 245–56.

2. Nicolas Gorjestani, Indigenous Knowledge for Development: Opportunities and Challenges, ERIC Educational Resources Information Center (Washington, DC: World Bank Group, 2001).

3. Nadaraj Govender, “Educational Implications of Applying the Complexity Approach to Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS),” Alternation 19, no. 2 (2012): 112–37.

4. Adefunke Sarah Ebijuwa, “The Role of Libraries in the Preservation of Indigenous Knowledge in Primary Healthcare in Nigeria,” International Journal of Digital Library Services 5, no. 2 (2015): 43–54.

5. Amanda Stevens, “A Different Way of Knowing: Tools and Strategies for Managing Indigenous Knowledge,” Libri 58, no. 1 (2008): 25–33.

6. Sophia Twarog and Promila Kapoor, eds. Protecting and Promoting Traditional Knowledge: Systems, National Experiences and International Dimension (New York and Geneva: United Nations, 2004).

7. Ibid.

8. Antonio C. Guedes and Maria José Amstalden Sampaio, “Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge in Brazil,” Protecting and Promoting Traditional Knowledge: Systems, National Experiences and International Dimensions (2004): 29.

9. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), “Charter on the Preservation of the Digital Heritage” (United Nations, 2003), https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000179529 (accessed August 14, 2014).

10. Ibid.

11. Jabulani Sithole, “The Challenges Faced by African Libraries and Information Centres in Documenting and Preserving Indigenous Knowledge,” IFLA Journal 33, no. 2 (2007): 117–23.

12. Jangawe Msuya, “Challenges and Opportunities in the Protection and Preservation of Indigenous Knowledge in Africa,” The International Review of Information Ethics 7 (2007): 346–53.

13. Tlou Maggie Masenya, “Digital Preservation of Indigenous Knowledge in South African Rural Communities,” in Handbook of Research on Protecting and Managing Global Indigenous Knowledge Systems, ed. Rendani Tshifhumulo and Tshimangadzo Justice Makhanikhe (Hershey: IGI Global, 2022), 317–40.

14. Sitwala Imenda, “Is There a Conceptual Difference between Theoretical and Conceptual Frameworks?” Journal of Social Sciences 38, no. 2 (2014): 185–95.

15. Helen Elise Green, “Use of Theoretical and Conceptual Frameworks in Qualitative Research,” Nurse Researcher 21, no. 6 (2014): 34–38.

16. Dennis Masaka, “The Prospects of Ending Epistemicide in Africa: Some Thoughts,” Journal of Black Studies 49, no. 3 (2018): 284–301.

17. Boaventura De Sousa Santos, Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide (New York: Routledge Publishing, 2007).

18. Bagele Chilisa, Indigenous Research Methodologies (Washington, DC: Sage Publications, 2019).

19. Evelyn Steinhauer, “Thoughts on an Indigenous Research Methodology,” Canadian Journal of Native Education 26, no. 2 (2002): 69–81.

20. Tim Murithi, “African Approaches to Building Peace and Social Solidarity,” African Journal on Conflict Resolution 6, no. 2 (2006): 9–33.

21. Mluleki Munyaka and Mokgethi Motlhabi, “Ubuntu and Its Socio-Moral Significance,” in African Ethics: An Anthology of Comparative and Applied Ethics, ed. M. F. Murove (Scottsville: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press, 2009), 63–84.

22. Bert Hamminga, “Epistemology from the African Point of View,” in Knowledge Cultures, ed. Bert Hamminga (Leiden: Brill, 2005), 57–84.

23. Ibid.

24. Jeanine Ntihirageza and Ibrahima Aissetu, “Education and Epistemicide in Africa: Towards an Ubuntu-Based Comprehensive Model of Education,” in Handbook of Research on Protecting and Managing Global Indigenous Knowledge Systems, ed. Rendani Tshifhumulo and Tshimangadzo Justice Makhanikhe (Pennsylvania, United States: IGI Global, 2022), 275–93.

25. Ibid.

26. Ibid.

27. Carnegie Mellon University, The System Security Engineering: Capability Maturity Model (SSE-CMM), Version 2 (1999).

28. Ibid.

29. Ibid.

30. Ibid.

31. Charles M. Dollar and Lorie Ashley, Assessing Digital Preservation Capability Using a Maturity Model Process Improvement Approach (Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University, 2014).

32. Ibid.

33. Ibid.

34. See note 27 above.

35. Gartner, Information Governance (Cape Town: Soarsoft International, 2014).

36. See note 31 above.

37. Ibid.

38. Council of Canadians Academies, Leading in the Digital World: Opportunities for Canada's Memory Institutions. The Expert Panel on Memory Institutions in the Digital Revolution. (Ottawa: Council of Canadian Academies, 2015).

39. Ibid.

40. The International Federation of Library Associations (IFLA) IFLA Governing Board, Bridging the Digital Divide: Making the World's Cultural and Scientific Heritage Accessible to All (IFLA/UNESCO Manifesto for Digital Libraries, 2010).

41. Chinwe V. Anunobi and Ifeyinwa B. Okoye, “The Role of Academic Libraries in Universal Access to Print and Electronic Resources in the Developing Countries,” Library Philosophy and Practice, (2008), https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1194&context=libphilprac.

42. See note 31 above.

43. The Society of American Archivists (SAA), Building Better Bridges: Archivists across the Digital Divide (Chicago, Illinois: North America, 2013).

44. See note 31 above.

45. See note 38 above.

46. See note 31 above.

47. Glenn A. Bowen, “Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method,” Qualitative Research Journal 9, no. 2 (2009): 27–40.

48. Hilary Arksey and Lisa O'Malley, “Scoping Studies: Towards a Methodological Framework,” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8, no. 1 (2005): 19–32.

49. Sheng Wang and Raymond A. Noe, “Knowledge Sharing: A Review and Directions for Future Research,” Human Resource Management Review 20, no. 2 (2010): 115–31.

50. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke, “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology,” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, no. 2 (2006): 77–101.

51. Barbara Kitchenham, Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews (New Castle: Keele University, 2004).

52. Marie-Claire Cordonier Segger and Freedom-Kai Phillips, “Indigenous Traditional Knowledge for Sustainable Development: The Biodiversity Convention and Plant Treaty Regimes,” Journal of Forest Research 20, no. 5 (2015): 430–37.

53. Justice Mensah, “Sustainable Development: Meaning, History, Principles, Pillars, and Implications for Human Action: Literature Review,” Cogent Social Sciences 5, no. 1 (2019): 1653531.

54. Luigi Petti, Claudia Trillo, and Busisiwe Chikomborero Ncube Makore, “Towards a Shared Understanding of the Concept of Heritage in the European Context,” Heritage 2, no. 3 (2019): 2531–44.

55. See note 52 above.

56. See note 54 above.

57. Giorgia Magni, “Indigenous Knowledge and Implications for the Sustainable Development Agenda,” European Journal of Education 52, no. 4 (2017): 437–47.

58. See note 13 above.

59. Julia Brungs and Stephen Wyber, “Preserving Our Digital Culture for the Future: Overcoming Obstacles through Collaboration,” IFLA eds, Edimburgo (2011): 36–40.

60. Tlou Maggie Masenya, “Decolonization of Indigenous Knowledge Systems in South Africa: Impact of Policy and Protocols,” International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM) 18, no. 1 (2022): 1–22.

61. See note 13 above.

62. See note 12 above.

63. Leanne R. Simpson, “Anticolonial Strategies for the Recovery and Maintenance of Indigenous Knowledge,” American Indian Quarterly 28, no. 3 (2004): 373–84.

64. Saravanan Nadason, Ram Al-Jaffri Saad, and Aidi Ahmi, “Knowledge Sharing and Barriers in Organizations: A Conceptual Paper on Knowledge-Management Strategy,” Indian-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Finance 1, no. 4 (2017): 32–41.

65. See note 11 above; Akeem Ayofe Akinwale, “Digitisation of Indigenous Knowledge for Natural Resources Management in Africa,” Africana (2155-7829) Proceedings of the AERN Summit 6, no. 2 (2013), ed. Curtis Burton and Christopher LaMonica (Raleigh: Network at North Carolina State University, May 19, 2013), 1–18; Ebele N. Anyaoku, Chinwe N. Ezeani, and Nkem E. Osuigwe, “Information Literacy Practices of Librarians in Universities in South East Nigeria,” International Journal of Library and Information Science 7, no. 5 (2015): 96–102.

66. Njabulo B. Khumalo, Cynthia Nsindane, and Silibaziso V. Khumalo, “The Custody, Preservation and Dissemination of Indigenous Knowledge within the Ndebele Community in Zimbabwe: A Case Study of Gonye Area in Tohwe, Nkayi District,” Oral History Journal of South Africa 6, no. 1 (2018): 1–12.

67. Erin Blakemore, “What Is Colonialism?” (National Geographic, 2019), https://www.nationalgeographic.com/culture/topics/reference/colonialism.

68. Ibid.

69. See note 60 above.

70. Shawn Wilson, “Progressing toward an Indigenous Research Paradigm in Canada and Australia,” Canadian Journal of Native Education 27, no. 2 (2004):161–78.

71. Douglas L. Morgan, “Appropriation, Appreciation, Accommodation: Indigenous Wisdoms and Knowledges in Higher Education,” International Review of Education 49, no. 1 (2003): 35–49.

72. John Briggs, “The Use of Indigenous Knowledge in Development: Problems and Challenges,” Progress in Development Studies 5, no. 2 (2005): 99–114.

73. Eve Tuck and K. Wayne Yang, “Decolonization Is Not a Metaphor,” Tabula Rasa 38 (2021): 61–111.

74. Louis Botha, “Using Expansive Learning to Include Indigenous Knowledge,” International Journal of Inclusive Education 16, no. 1 (2012): 57–70.

75. Robby Zidny, Jesper Sjöström, and Ingo Eilks, “A Multi-Perspective Reflection on How Indigenous Knowledge and Related Ideas Can Improve Science Education for Sustainability,” Science & Education 29, no. 1 (2020): 145–85.

76. Heleta Savo, “Decolonizing Knowledge in South Africa: Dismantling the ‘Pedagogy of Big Lies’,” Ufahamu: A Journal of African Studies 40, no. 2 (2018): 47–65.

77. Bo Xing and Tshilidzi Marwala, “Implications of the Fourth Industrial Age for Higher Education,” The Thinker no. 73 (2017): 10–15.

78. Aslam Fataar, “Placing Students at the Centre of the Decolonizing Education Imperative: Engaging the (Mis) Recognition Struggles of Students at the Post-apartheid University,” Educational Studies 54, no. 6 (2018): 595–608.

79. Zodwa Motsa, “When the Lion Tells the Story: A Response from South Africa,” Higher Education Research & Development 36, no. 1 (2017): 28–35.

80. M. B. Ogunniyi, “Teachers’ Stances and Practical Arguments Regarding a Science‐Indigenous Knowledge Curriculum: Part 1,” International Journal of Science Education 29, no. 8 (2007): 963–86.

81. Moyra Keane, Constance Khupe, and Maren Seehawer, “Decolonising Methodology: Who Benefits from Indigenous Knowledge Research?” Educational Research for Social Change 6, no. 1 (2017): 12–24; Datta Ranjan, “Decolonizing Both Researcher and Research and Its Effectiveness in Indigenous Research,” Research Ethics 14, no. 2 (2018): 1–24.

82. Margaret Kovach, Indigenous Methodologies: Characteristics, Conversations, and Contexts (Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press, 2021).

83. Joseph P. Gone, “Considering Indigenous Research Methodologies: Critical Reflections by an Indigenous Knower,” Qualitative Inquiry 25, no. 1 (2019): 45–56.

84. See note 20 above.

85. Queeneth Mkabela, “Using the Afrocentric Method in Researching Indigenous African Culture,” The Qualitative Report 10, no. 1 (2005): 178–89.

86. Martin Nakata, “Anthropological Texts and Indigenous Standpoints,” Australian Aboriginal Studies 2 (1998): 3–12; Russell Bishop, “Kaupapa Maori Research: An Indigenous Approach to Creating Knowledge,” in Maori and Psychology. Proceedings of a Symposium Sponsored by the Maori and Psychology Research Unit, ed. N. Robertson (New Zealand: University of Waikato Academic Press, 1999), 1–6.

87. Ivy Goduka Nomalungelo and Yolisa Madolo, “Creating Spaces for eZiko Sipheka Sisophula Theoretical Framework for Teaching and Researching in Higher Education: A Philosophical Exposition,” Indilinga African Journal of Indigenous Knowledge Systems 12, no. 1 (2013): 1–12.

88. Gubela Mji, Opting for a Walk without Limbs: The Avoidance of Stellenbosch University to Be an African University (South Africa: Stellenbosch University Library Auditorium, 2019).

89. Yvonna S. Lincoln, “Emerging Criteria for Quality in Qualitative and Interpretive Research,” Qualitative Inquiry 1, no. 3 (1995): 275–89.

90. Marie-Claude Tremblay, Debbie H. Martin, Alex M. McComber, Amelia McGregor, and Ann C. Macaulay, “Understanding Community-Based Participatory Research through a Social Movement Framework: A Case Study of the Kahnawake Schools Diabetes Prevention Project,” BMC Public Health 18, no. 1 (2018): 1–17.

91. Margaret Cargo and Shawna L. Mercer, “The Value and Challenges of Participatory Research: Strengthening Its Practice,” Annual Review of Public Health 29 (2008): 325–50.

92. Keane et al., “Decolonising Methodology.”

93. The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. Constitutional Assembly, South Africa (1996).

94. Ron Darwin and Norton Bonny, “Transnational Identity and Migrant Language Learners: The Promise of Digital Storytelling,” Education Matters 2, no. 1 (2014): 55–66.

95. András Kornai, “Digital Language Death,” PLoS One 8, no. 10 (2013): Article e77056, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077056.