Abstract
This study assessed nine participants, who sustained multiple strokes and had spatial neglect, one year after participation in a prior trial on whether Prism Adaptation Treatment (PAT) was a feasible and effective treatment for spatial neglect remediation compared to standard care. The objectives were to: (1) describe the sample, (2) measure the degree of spatial neglect symptoms if present, and (3) determine group differences in motor and spatial performance. Three (60%) participants from the PAT group and two (50%) from the comparison group still displayed spatial neglect. A series of two-way mixed ANOVAs exploring group (PAT vs. comparison of standard care) and time effects (pretest vs. posttest vs. follow-up) found a main effect of time for all participants on the Kessler Foundation Neglect Assessment (F(1,2) = 30.28, p<.001), Functional Independence Measure (F(1,2) = 16.998, p<.001), and star cancelation (F(1,2) = 11.077, p<.001). An interaction effect of time*prism was observed when assessing the line bisection test (F(1,2) = 6.986, p = .008), suggesting that the PAT group performed significantly better on this test. Additional research should be completed with a larger sample in order to better understand the PAT long term effects as well as develop clinical recommendations for occupational therapy practitioners.
Declaration of Interest
The author reports no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Funding
Notes on contributors
Kimberly Hreha
Kimberly is a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Washington, with interests in stroke rehabilitation research and spatial neglect.
Timothy Rich
Timothy is a PhD student in the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine at the University of Washington.
Jennifer Wong
Jennifer is a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Washington with interests in policy, value-based payment, long term care, and disability.