4,100
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Major Articles

Struggling with the basics: food and housing insecurity among college students across twenty-two colleges and universities

, Dr PH, RDNORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , PhD, RDNORCID Icon, , PhD, RDN, CSSD, , PhD, ORCID Icon, , PhD, MPH, RD, LDNORCID Icon, , PhD, , PhD, MPH, RD, , PhD, MPH, RDORCID Icon, , PhDORCID Icon, , PhDORCID Icon, , PhD, RDNORCID Icon, , PhD, RD, , MA, BS, , PhDORCID Icon, , PhD, RD, , PhD, RD, LD, , PhD, MS, MPH, RD, , PhD, RD, , PhD, RD, , PhD, , PhD, , PhDORCID Icon, , PhD, RDN, LDN & , BS show all
Pages 2518-2529 | Received 12 Jun 2020, Accepted 03 Sep 2021, Published online: 29 Sep 2021
 

Abstract

Objectives

To quantify the number and type of students failing to secure basic needs.

Participants

Students attending 22 postsecondary schools in the United States in Fall 2019.

Methods

The Adult Food Security Module and part of the #RealCollege Survey were used to measure food and housing insecurity, respectively. Logistic and linear regression models were used to assess the relationship between selected factors and basic needs insecurities.

Results

Participants (n = 22,153) were classified as 44.1% and 52.3% food insecure and housing insecure, respectively. Homeless students or those who experienced childhood food insecurity were at the greatest odds of college food insecurity. Year in school was the largest contributor to being housing insecure, with PhD or EdD students being 1,157% more likely to experience housing insecurity compared to freshmen.

Conclusions

High prevalence of basic needs insecurities remain. Current campus initiatives may be insufficient, calling for a more holistic approach at the campus, state, and national levels.

Availability of data and material

The datasets generated and/or analyzed in the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report. The authors confirm that the research presented in this article met the ethical guidelines, including adherence to the legal requirements, of the United States of America and received approval from the Institutional Review Board at West Virginia University.

Funding details

This work was supported by West Virginia University Experimental Station Hatch no. WVA00627 and WVA00641. The funding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of the data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.