1,840
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Clinical Study

The efficacy and safety of roxadustat for anemia in patients with dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

, , &
Article: 2195011 | Received 19 Oct 2022, Accepted 03 Mar 2023, Published online: 25 Jul 2023
 

Abstract

Background

This meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of roxadustat in treating anemia patients with dialysis-dependent (DD) chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Methods

We comprehensively searched 5 databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating roxadustat for anemia in DD-CKD patients. RevMan 5.0 was used to extract and synthesize data for meta-analysis.

Results

Ten different RCTs (9 studies) and 5698 DD-CKD patients with anemia were included. Our findings revealed that when compared to the erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) group, the roxadustat group showed increased hemoglobin levels [MD (Mean Difference) 0.25 g/dL (95%CI 0.14 g/dL to 0.36 g/dL), p < 0.00001] and improved iron-utilization by increasing serum iron [MD 1.85 µmol/L], total iron binding capacity [MD 35.73 µg/dL], transferrin saturation [MD 1.19%], and transferrin level [MD 0.40 g/L]. In addition, we found that roxadustat significantly decreased the low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol [MD −0.39 mmol/L] and total cholesterol [MD −0.6 mmol/L]. In patients with a C-reactive protein level that exceeds the upper limit of the normal range, hemoglobin levels were higher for roxadustat than for ESAs [MD 0.39 g/dL]. Treatment-emergent adverse events, treatment-emergent serious adverse events, and major adverse cardiovascular events were not significantly different between the two groups.

Conclusions

The hemoglobin levels of DD-CKD patients were significantly increased and not affected by the inflammatory state after roxadustat treatment. Roxadustat also improved iron utilization, and it was not associated with higher treatment-emergent adverse events, treatment-emergent serious adverse events, and major adverse cardiovascular events when compared to ESAs.

Acknowledgements

We thank Jing Ma (Office of Cancer Prevention and Treatment, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China) for providing methodological assistance for this manuscript.

Authors’ contributions

QZ and MM were involved in the research idea and study design. QZ, JL and FD were responsible for data acquisition. QZ and MM were involved in data analysis and interpretation. JL and FD were involved in supervision or mentorship. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Disclosure statement

All authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. The authors declare that this article has not been published previously in whole or in part.

Data availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.