194
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Systematic Review

Efficacy and safety of short-term 1–3 months versus standard 12 months dual antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

, , , , &
Pages 582-590 | Received 28 Feb 2020, Accepted 12 Jun 2020, Published online: 05 Jul 2020
 

Abstract

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is the basis of preventing stent thrombosis and ischemic events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but prolonging the duration of DAPT will increase the risk of bleeding. The optimal duration of DAPT after PCI remains controversial at present. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate the efficacy and safety of short-term DAPT in patients undergoing PCI. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Web of science from inception to September 2019 were systematically searched. Randomized controlled trials were included to compare short term (3 months or less) with a standard 12-months DAPT in patients undergoing PCI. Random effect model and fixed effect model wereused to calculate the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of each endpoint. This meta-analysis included 38479 patients undergoing PCI from 8 randomized clinical trials. No difference was observed in the risk of all-cause death (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.80–1.06, P = 0.25), cardiovascular death (RR 0.88, 0.69–1.12, P = 0.29), myocardial infarction (RR 1.05, 0.94–1.19, P = 0.38), definite or probable stent thrombosis (RR 1.05, 0.80–1.36, P = 0.73), and stroke (RR 1.02, 0.80–1.30, P = 0.89) between short term and standard DAPT. The short-term DAPT could reduce the risk of major bleeding (RR 0.67, 0.48–0.94, P = 0.02) and any bleeding (RR 0.63, 0.48-0.82, P = 0.0005) compared with 12 months of DAPT. In conclusion, the short-term DAPT can reduce the risk of bleeding compared with standard DAPT, without increasing the risk of death or ischemia (Registered by PROSPERO, CRD42020153881).

Disclosure Statement

The author states that there is no conflict of interest and no financial support.

Statement Of Contribution

Wen-Jiao Zhang: Research design, Data collection, Data analysis, Manuscript. Xuan Qiao: Data collection, Data analysis. Xi-Ying Liang: Data collection, Validation. Yan Li: Data collection, Validation. Rong-Rong Yang: Data collection. Zhi-Lu Wang: Scientific revision of the manuscript.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed on the publisher’s website.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.