1,065
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research

Is a single day patient friendly methyl aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy illumination scheme for superficial basal cell carcinoma feasible? A randomized multicenter pilot trial

, , , , &
Pages 194-199 | Received 24 Feb 2018, Accepted 21 May 2018, Published online: 27 Jul 2018
 

Abstract

Background: Topical methyl aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy (MAL-PDT) is highly effective for the treatment of superficial basal cell carcinoma (sBCC). Current European treatment protocol requires two hospital visits, which is costly and unpractical. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of fractionated MAL-PDT, using two light fractions at 3 and 4 h compared to illumination at 3 and 5 h after MAL-application.

Methods: Thirty patients were randomized into two groups. The first group received illumination at 3 and 4 h (20 + 55 J/cm2) after MAL-application (3/4 group). In the other group, two light fractions were performed at 3 and 5 h (20 + 55 J/cm2) after MAL-application (3/5 group). The lesion response was evaluated at 3 and 12 months posttreatment.

Results: In the 3/5 group, 70.0% showed a complete response (CR) at 3 months compared to 63.6% in the other group. At 12 months, 100% showed a CR in the 3/5 group compared to 80.0% in the other group. However, most failures/recurrences were eventually due to the presence of a more aggressive BCC subtype, mostly caused by sampling error of the primary punch biopsy.

Conclusion: Single day protocol for MAL-PDT for sBCC is feasible and this study shows promising results.

Disclosure statement

Nguyen and Hoogedoorn received financial support from Galderma for performing clinical trials.

Smits received speaker’s honoraria from Galderma for organising PDT-related workshops and financial support for performing clinical trials.

Gerritsen received speaker’s honoraria from Galderma, 3 M and Medac and joined Galderma and Leo Pharma advisory board. Furthermore, she received financial support from PhotoCure, Galderma, Leo Pharma and 3 M for performing clinical trials.

Knuiman and Blokx have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Funding

This work was funded by Galderma S.A., Switzerland.