7,248
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Efficacy and safety of topical treatments for seborrheic keratoses: a systematic review

ORCID Icon, , , &
Article: 2133532 | Received 26 Aug 2022, Accepted 30 Sep 2022, Published online: 13 Nov 2022
 

Abstract

Seborrheic keratoses (SKs) are benign epidermal neoplasms presenting as waxy, brown to black papules and plaques. Patients often seek removal for cosmetic reasons or irritation. The objective of this systematic review is to assess the efficacy and safety of topical treatments for SKs. Studies involving any topical medication indicated for SK removal were retrieved from Embase, Scopus, PubMed, and Cochrane. The final search was conducted on November 9, 2021, and 26 reports met inclusion criteria. A quality rating scheme was utilized to assess evidence quality. Heterogeneity of treatments and outcome measures precluded meta-analysis. Topical treatments that yielded a good-to-excellent response include hydrogen peroxide, Maxacalcitol 25 µg/g, BID Tazarotene 0.1% cream, 5% potassium dobesilate cream, 1% diclofenac sodium solution, urea-based solution, and 65% and 80% trichloroacetic acid. Local skin reactions were often mild and transient. Topical hydrogen peroxide showed the greatest evidence for clinical clearance of SKs, although there are no studies to our knowledge that directly compared hydrogen peroxide to current first-line treatments (e.g. cryotherapy or shave excision). The results of this review suggest viable and safe treatment of SK with topical therapies; however, there remains demand for topical treatments that reliably equate or exceed the efficacy of current first-line therapies.

Key Points

  • Question: Are safe and efficacious topical treatments for seborrheic keratoses available?

  • Findings: Topical treatments for seborrheic keratoses yield different responses and may be associated with local skin reactions. Topical hydrogen peroxide shows the greatest evidence for clinical clearance of seborrheic keratoses and may be a viable option for patients requesting noninvasive removal. No studies to our knowledge directly compare hydrogen peroxide to current first-line treatments.

  • Meaning: There remains demand for topical treatments that reliably equate or exceed the efficacy of current first-line therapies.

Disclosure statement

James Grichnik, MD, PhD is a Consultant to Galileo and Canfield Scientific. The remaining authors have no relationships to disclose.

IRB approval status

Exempt.