Abstract
Background
Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is an adjunctive treatment in androgenetic alopecia (AGA). Its role as a monotherapy, when compared to FDA-approved therapies in moderate grades of androgenetic alopecia is not established.
Objectives
We sought to study the efficacy and safety of standardized non-activated PRP preparation against topical minoxidil in AGA.
Methods
Men aged 20–50 with Grade III and IV (Modified Hamilton-Norwood) AGA were randomized to receive 5% Minoxidil (×6 months) or PRP injections (monthly ×3). The primary endpoints were global photographic assessment at week 24, change in target area hair counts, density, and anagen hair at week 12. Other outcomes were subjects’ satisfaction and adverse events.
Results
In total, 64 participants were randomized. At week 24, 56% responded to Minoxidil arm and 38% to PRP (p = 0.124). There was a significant increase in target area hair count and density at week 12 within the groups. The difference between the groups was not statistically significant. Adverse events occurred in 53% and 37% of the PRP and minoxidil groups, respectively. Patient satisfaction was better with Minoxidil.
Conclusion
PRP is effective in the treatment of moderate grades of androgenetic alopecia in men, although perhaps not different from minoxidil. Side effects occur more frequently with PRP.
Ethics approval
The study was approved by the Institutional scientific and ethics committee (JIP/IEC/2019/465) on 11-02-2020.
Patient consent
The researchers obtained patient consent for scientific publication.
Author contributions
Mithinkumar was involved in protocol drafting, running the treatment, and assisting in drafting the manuscript. Rashmi Kumari screened subjects of AGA for recruitment and provided inputs for the protocol and final draft. Sivaranjini was involved in protocol refining, screened subjects for recruitment, lead the draft of the manuscript and overall supervised. Dermatosurgery fellow in the department handled the random table and allocation. Two other experienced dermatologists in the department, blinded to the allocation, did the outcome assessment. A blinded statistician in the institution did data analysis.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Data availability statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author [SR], upon reasonable request.