1,788
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

RENEB biodosimetry intercomparison analyzing translocations by FISH

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 30-35 | Received 24 Feb 2016, Accepted 21 Jul 2016, Published online: 05 Oct 2016
 

Abstract

Purpose: In the framework of RENEB, several biodosimetry exercises were conducted analyzing different endpoints. Among them, the analysis of translocations is considered the most useful method for retrospective biodosimetry due to the relative stability of their frequency with post irradiation time. The aim of this study was to harmonize the accuracy of translocation-based biodosimetry within the RENEB consortium.

Materials and methods: An initial telescoring exercise analyzing FISH metaphase images was done to harmonize chromosome aberration descriptions. Then two blind intercomparison exercises (IE) were performed, by sending irradiated blood samples to each partner. Samples were cultured and stained by each partner using their standard protocol and translocation frequency was used to produce dose estimates.

Results: The coefficient of variation in the 1st IE (CV = 0.34) was higher than in the 2nd IE (CV = 0.16 and 0.23 in the two samples analyzed), for the genomic frequency of total translocations. Z-score analysis revealed that eight out of 10 and 17 out of 20 dose estimates were satisfactory in the 1st and 2nd IE, respectively.

Conclusions: The results obtained indicate that, despite the problems identified in few partners, which can be corrected, the RENEB consortium is able to carry out retrospective biodosimetry analyzing the frequency of translocations by FISH.

Acknowledgements

This work received financial support from the European Seventh Framework Programme (295513). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are response for the content and writing of the paper.