Anatomical distribution of musculoskeletal disorders following a road traffic collision in litigants presenting to physiotherapists within a private-clinic in North-East England

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are common following a road traffic collision (RTC) in England. Establishing the anatomical distribution of MSDs following RTC that present to physiotherapists may improve understanding and clinical practice. This study examined anatomical distribution of MSDs that present to physiotherapists within a litigant population following a RTC in England. Methods: A retrospective review of physiotherapy records was conducted at a private practice in North-East England. Data were collected from 2105 patients between January 2014 and December 2015. The primary outcome was anatomical regions with MSDs. Descriptive data is reported. Results: Overall, 90% of patients presented with a neck/upper back disorder, while 52% presented with a lower back disorder. Of the assessed patients, 46% presented with one MSD, 45% presented with two MSDs while 9% presented with ≥3 MSDs. Further analysis showed that those who presented to physiotherapy later and were not motor vehicle occupants (MVOs) were more likely to have upper-limb, lower-limb, or lumbar MSDs. Younger patients, who presented sooner and were non-MVO were more likely to have multiple regions affected by MSDs. Conclusions: This study presents epidemiological evidence that MSDs following a RTC occur primarily in the neck/upper back or lower back regions, and that multiple MSDs are common.

KEYWORDS:

• Distribution
• low back pain
• musculoskeletal disorders
• physiotherapy
• road traffic collision
• whiplash associated disorder

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge On Medical Ltd. and the physiotherapists who collected the original data, namely; Lucy Porteous, Kanchan Chugh, Mic Hutchinson, Ross Cairns, Cillian O’Shaughnessy, Laura Clark, Michael Armstrong, Chris Bell, Sarah Lambley, Brittany Cooke, Seb Dearle and Brent Eales.

Declaration of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.