Publication Cover
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
An International Journal of Physical Therapy
Volume 37, 2021 - Issue 4
578
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Descriptive Report

Cross-cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the patient determined disease steps scale in persons with multiple sclerosis

, PhD, PTORCID Icon, , MSc, PT & , MD
Pages 527-534 | Received 28 Sep 2018, Accepted 19 May 2019, Published online: 20 Jun 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Background: Patient Determined Disease Steps (PDDS) scale is a patient-reported outcome measure to assess disability in persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). This scale can be used as an alternative to Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) as it is a costly, more time-consuming, and clinician-based method. This study aimed to conduct Turkish translation and cross-cultural adaptation of PDDS and investigate its psychometric properties.

Methods: Turkish translation and cross-cultural adaptation of PDDS was conducted. Its psychometric properties including validity (i.e. content, criterion, and construct) and test-retest reliability (relative and absolute) were investigated in 100 pwMS.

Results: PDDS had a significant strong correlation with EDSS (rs = 0.61, p < .001). Regression model to predict EDSS scores from PDDS scores was significant (p < .001, R2 = 0.67). Both PDDS and EDSS were significantly correlated with age, disease duration, walking speed and endurance, perceived impact of MS on walking, functional mobility, working memory and information processing speed, visual memory, manual dexterity, and health-related quality of life (p < .05). No significant difference was observed in the correlation coefficients of PDDS and EDSS (p > .05). Relative test-retest reliability was found high [ICC = 0.99 (95%CI = 0.99, 0.99)]. Absolute test-retest reliability was high as the Bland-Altman analyses showed no significant systematic bias between the repeated assessments. A narrow range of the limits of agreement indicated that PDDS had high stability and low variation between first and second assessments.

Conclusion: Turkish version of PDDS presented high validity and test-retest reliability in pwMS.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Multiple Sclerosis Research Association for help during the recruitment of the participants, Dr. Hohol for the permission to conduct the Turkish validation, and all participants for their willingness to participate.

Declaration of Interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.