![Sample our Health and Social Care journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5938/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Health-Social-Care.jpg"})
Abstract
Purpose. This cross-sectional study examined whether partnering with service dogs influenced psychosocial well-being and community participation of adult individuals using wheelchairs or scooters.
Method. One hundred and fifty-two people were recruited and group-matched, resulting in 76 participants with and 76 without service dogs. Standardized scale scores for affect, depressive symptoms, self-esteem, and loneliness were used to operationally define psychosocial well-being. Community participation was assessed with the ‘Social Integration’ domain of the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique.
Results. Psychosocial characteristics did not differ significantly between those partnered with and without service dogs overall. However, of participants with progressive conditions, those with service dogs demonstrated significantly higher positive affect scores than comparison group participants. Among those with clinical depression, service dog partners scored significantly higher in positive affect. Finally, regardless of whether individuals had service dogs, fewer depressive symptoms and being female or married were predictors of greater community participation.
Conclusion. Select individuals may experience psychosocial benefits from partnering with service dogs. However, it is unclear if these benefits might also be derived from companion dogs. Further research is needed to substantiate the findings of this study.
| Abbreviations | ||
| CES-D | = | Centre for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale |
| CHART | = | Craig Handicap and Assessment Reporting Technique |
| HERL | = | Human Engineering Research Laboratories at the VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System |
| PANAS | = | Positive and Negative Affect Scale |
| RSE | = | Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale |
| UCLA-3 | = | University of California, Los Angeles, Loneliness Scale, Version 3 |
| VA | = | Veterans Administration |
| Abbreviations | ||
| CES-D | = | Centre for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale |
| CHART | = | Craig Handicap and Assessment Reporting Technique |
| HERL | = | Human Engineering Research Laboratories at the VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System |
| PANAS | = | Positive and Negative Affect Scale |
| RSE | = | Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale |
| UCLA-3 | = | University of California, Los Angeles, Loneliness Scale, Version 3 |
| VA | = | Veterans Administration |
