Politics, policy and payment – facilitators or barriers to person-centred rehabilitation?

Abstract

Aims. This paper explores the tensions between politics and payment in providing affordable services that satisfy the public demand for patient-centred care.

Key findings and implications. The two main approaches taken by the UK Government to curtail the spiralling costs of healthcare have been to focus development in priority areas and to cap spending through the introduction of a fixed-tariff episode-based funding system. The National Service Framework for Long Term Neurological Conditions embraces many laudable principles of person-centred management, but the ‘one-size-fits all’ approach to reimbursement potentially cuts right across these. A series of tools have been developed to determine complexity of rehabilitation needs that will support the development of banded tariffs. A practical approach is also offered to demonstrate the cost-efficiency of rehabilitation services for people with complex needs, and help to ensure that they are not excluded from treatment because of their higher treatment costs.

Conclusions. Whilst responding to public demand for person-centred care, we must recognize the current financial pressure on healthcare systems. Clinicians will have greater credibility if they routinely collect and share outcomes that demonstrate the economic benefits of intervention, as well the impact on health, function and quality of life.

Keywords:

• Rehabilitation
• complex neurological disability
• cost-efficiency

Notes

1. FIM = Functional Independence Measure. FIM™ is a trademark of the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation, a division of UB Foundation Activities, Inc.