Russia’s approach to arms control: caught between asymmetry and the desire for strategic stability

ABSTRACT

This paper analyses Russia’s approach to strategic arms control with a particular focus on two central yet largely paradoxical principles: strategic stability and asymmetry. A rise in asymmetries in the capabilities of the United States and the Russian Federation, global shifts in power, and a proceeding deterioration of U.S.–Russia relations have marked the post-Cold War era, challenging traditional arms control regimes based on strategic stability understood in terms of parity in the nuclear arsenals of the two most potent nuclear powers. Somewhat counterintuitively, the developments in the military-technological sphere that undermine the very principle of parity concurrently incentivise Russia to invest in asymmetric solutions to counterbalance these tendencies and maintain strategic stability. By analysing the views of Russian military experts, the article takes a look at the INF Treaty, New START and hypersonic weapons to examine the past, present and future challenges to the U.S.–Russian arms control architecture. It arrives at the conclusion that Russia’s home-grown solution to its security conundrum is a perplexing mix of a desire for strategic stability-cum-parity in strategic arms control and a pragmatic emphasis on asymmetries while it tries to preserve its position, which is symptomatic of the paradoxical nature of strategy itself.

KEYWORDS:

• Russia
• arms control
• strategic stability
• INF Treaty
• New START
• hypersonic weapons

Acknowledgments

I owe a very special thanks to Dr. Matúš Halás for all his invaluable comments and patient guidance throughout the whole writing process. Many thanks also go to the anonymous referees who helped me to get my argument come across more clearly.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).