![Sample our Health and Social Care journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5938/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Health-Social-Care.jpg"})
Abstract
This paper continues to develop ‘drugs as instruments’ framework by reviewing Science and Technology Studies (STS), critical drug studies and anthropology of pharmaceuticals literature that frames drugs as pharmacological technologies. By discussing especially human enhancement drugs (HEDs) this approach is situated in the new materialist turn in critical drug studies. All drugs, medical and nonmedical, are framed as pharmacological technologies and discussed as nonhuman actors. When discussing drugs as technologies the paper will focus generally on their ‘social effects’ which include extra-pharmacological variables. These extra-pharmacological variables include what the author refers to as politicogenic drug effects, meaning effects that derive from contemporary drug policing.
Keywords:
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Notes
1 In this context it would also be important to consider the embodied (Varela et al., Citation1991), extended (Clark & Chalmers, Citation1998) and/or social (e.g. Pickersgill, Citation2013) aspects of brain and cognition, not only for social theory but also for future clinical research but these aspects are largely left out from this paper.