98
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The interdependence between China and the United States: a two-level analysis

&
Pages 321-339 | Published online: 18 Aug 2010
 

Abstract

This paper constructs a two-level model to explain China–U.S. relations. We find that at the state level, the interdependence between China and the United States, which comes from their bilateral trade and foreign direct investment, is asymmetric. Such asymmetric interdependence favors the United States in pushing the Chinese government to make concessions when they have conflicts. However, at the society level, China can penetrate into American society to intervene or influence American foreign policymaking. In this paper, it is argued that the outcome of China–U.S. relations is determined not only by the asymmetric interdependence at the state level or societal penetration respectively, but also by the interaction of these two factors in the process. Finally, the new development of China–U.S. relations since the inauguration of the Obama administration is also examined.

Notes

1. Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Cooperation (MOFTEC), Statistics on FDI in China (2001).

2. Edward D. Mansfield and Brian M. Pollins, “Interdependence and Conflict: A Conceptual and Empirical Overview,” in Economic Interdependence and International Conflict: New Perspectives on an Enduring Debate, ed. Edward D. Mansfield and Brian M. Pollins (University of Michigan Press, 2003).

3. Chalmers Johnson, “Breaching the Great Wall,” American Prospect (January/February 1997): 24.

4. Ezra F. Vogel, Living with China (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., 1997), 9.

5. Shuxun Chen and Charles Wolf, Jr., China, the United States, and the Global Economy (Santa Monica, CA: Rand, 2001), 214.

6. Sheila R. Cherry, “Enriching China,” Insight on the News 17, no. 24 (June 25, 2001): 10–12.

7. Robert S. Ross, “Why Our Hardliners Are Wrong,” National Interest (Fall 1997).

8. Christopher Layne, “A House of Cards: American Strategy toward China,” World Policy Journal (Fall 1997): 83.

9. Chen and Wolf, China, the United States, and the Global Economy, 241.

10. Chen and Wolf, China, the United States, and the Global Economy, 243.

11. Ross, “Why Our Hardliners Are Wrong.”

12. Vogel, Living with China, 191.

13. Jialin Zhang, “Sino-US Trade Issue after the WTO Deal: A Chinese Perspective,” Journal of Contemporary China (July 2000): 311.

14. Robert Keohane and Joseph Nye, Power and Interdependence (New York: Harper Collins, 1989); David Baldwin, ed., Neorealism and Neoliberalism: the Contemporary Debate (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993).

15. Steve A. Yetiv, “Peace, Interdependence, and the Middle East,” Political Science Quarterly 12, no. 1 (1997): 29–49.

16. Zafar Shah Khan, “Patterns of Direct Foreign Investment in China,” World Bank Discussion Papers, no. 130 (Washington, DC: World Bank, 1991).

17. Richard Lowry, “China Trade—Without Guilt,” National Review, May 14, 2001, 40.

18. Harry Harding, A Fragile Relationship: The United States and China since 1972 (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1992).

19. Yetiv, “Peace, Interdependence, and the Middle East.”

20. Yetiv, “Peace, Interdependence, and the Middle East.”

21. Robert Gilpin, U.S. Power and the Multinational Corporations: the Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investment (New York: Basic Books, 1975).

22. Dale C. Copeland, “Economic Interdependence and War: A Theory of Trade Expectations,” International Security 20, no. 4 (Spring 1996): 5–41.

23. Chung-in Moon, “Complex Interdependence and Transnational Lobbying: South Korea in the United States,” International Studies Quarterly 32, no. 1 (March 1988): 67–89.

24. Chung-in Moon, “Complex Interdependence and Transnational Lobbying: South Korea in the United States,” International Studies Quarterly 32, no. 1 (March 1988): 67–89.

25. Chung-in Moon, “Complex Interdependence and Transnational Lobbying: South Korea in the United States,” International Studies Quarterly 32, no. 1 (March 1988): 67–89.

26. Audrae Erickson, “Lobbying Congress: A Key Way U.S. Citizens Impact Foreign Policy,” Electronic Journals of the US Department of State (Washington, DC: Office of International Information Programs, March 2000).

27. Kevin Platt and Ann Scott Tyson, “China Taps a Key Ally in US: Business,” The Christian Monitor, International, October 28, 1997.

28. Barbara G. Haskel, “Access to Society: A Neglected Dimension of Power,” International Organization 34, no. 1 (Winter 1980): 89–120.

29. Moon, “Complex Interdependence and Transnational Lobbying.”

30. “Effective Lobbying Brings China PNTR One Step Closer,” Oklahoma Business Advocate (Oklahoma State Chamber, Third Quarter, 2000).

31. “Business Lobbies Hard on China,” BBC News, Business, May 18, 2000.

32. Carter Dougherty, “Corporations Turn to Internet to Champion Political Cause,” Chicago Tribune, April 3, 2000.

33. Thomas Risse-Kappen, “Introduction,” in Bringing Transnational Relations Back In, ed. Thomas Risse-Kappen (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1995).

34. Jie Chen and Peng Deng, China since Culture Revolution: From Totalitarianism to Authoritarianism (Westport, CT: Praeger, 1995).

35. Kenneth Lieberthal, Governing China: From Revolution through Reform, 2nd ed. (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2004).

36. Risse-Kappen, “Introduction.”

37. David Lampton, Same Bed, Different Dream (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2001).

38. Vogel, Living with China, 192.

39. For a strong statement of this argument, see Richard Bernstein and Ross Munro, The Coming Conflict with China (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1997).

40. Stephen D. Krasner, “U.S. Commercial and Monetary Policy,” in Between Power and Plenty: Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States, ed. Peter Katzenstein (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1984), 164.

41. Stephen D. Krasner, “U.S. Commercial and Monetary Policy,” in Between Power and Plenty: Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States, ed. Peter Katzenstein (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1984), 55.

42. “Effective Lobbying Brings China PNTR One Step Closer.”

43. Tianjian Shi and Meredith Wen, “Avoiding Mutual Misunderstanding: Sino-U.S. Relations and the New Administration,” Policy Brief (Washington, DC: The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, January 2009).

44. Barry Naughton, The Chinese Economy, Transitions and Growth (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2007).

45. Based on interviews with Professor Zhao Suisheng, Executive Director of the Center for China–U.S. Cooperation at the Graduate School of International Studies, University of Denver.

46. Xinhua News Agency (Beijing), March 2, 2010.

47. Stephanie T. Kleine-Ahlbrandt, “Beijing, Global Free-Rider,” Foreign Policy, November 12, 2009.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.