486
Views
57
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original

Morbidity and transplant-related mortality of CBV and BEAM preparative regimens for patients with lymphoid malignancies undergoing autologous stem-cell transplantation

, , , , , , , , , , & , MD show all
Pages 1488-1494 | Accepted 09 Dec 2005, Published online: 01 Jul 2009
 

Abstract

CBV and BEAM are the two most frequently used regimens for patients with lymphoma undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (ASCT). This study compared their morbidity and transplant-related mortality (TRM) in 113 patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (69) and Hodgkin's disease (44) undergoing ASCT between 1990 – 2004. CBV (cyclophosphamide, 6000 mg m−2; VP-16, 750 mg m−2; and high-dose BCNU, 800 mg m−2) was administered to 75 patients and 38 received BEAM (BCNU, 300 mg m−2; VP-16, 800 mg m−2; cytarabine, 800 mg m−2; melphalan, 140 mg m−2). Patients in the BEAM group had a significantly higher median age (p = 0.002) and were more heavily treated before ASCT (p = 0.003). More patients showed active disease at transplant in the BEAM group (p = 0.04). Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) was more frequent in the CBV group (11% vs 0%, p = 0.048). There were 20 (18%) transplant-related deaths, 18 in the CBV and two in the BEAM group. Infectious complications (12 patients, seven with pneumonia) and SOS (four) were the most frequent causes of death. The cumulative incidences of TRM were 25% in the CBV and 7% in the BEAM group (p = 0.02). CBV thus produced a higher incidence of SOS and TRM than BEAM in this series.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.