343
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles: Clinical

Can the SUVmax-liver-based interpretation improve prognostic accuracy of interim and posttreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma?

, , , , , & show all
Pages 660-669 | Received 15 Jan 2017, Accepted 09 Jul 2017, Published online: 03 Aug 2017
 

Abstract

In order to investigate whether the SUVmax-liver-based interpretation could improve prognostic accuracy of interim (PET-4) and posttreatment PET/CT (PET-end), 115 patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL were recruited in the study. ROC analysis revealed the optimal threshold is 1.6-fold of SUVmax-liver for PET-4 and 1.4-fold of SUVmax-liver for PET-end. The SUVmax-liver-based interpretation had a perfect interobserver agreement, higher prognostic accuracy and positive predictive value than 5-point scale and %ΔSUVmax criteria in both PET-4 and PET-end. Dramatic differences in the outcome between patients with positive and negative PET-4/PET-end were demonstrated using Kaplan–Meier survival curves (p < .05). Univariate and multifactor analysis found PET-4 and PET-end were independent prognostic factors for the outcome of DLBCL. In conclusion, the SUVmax-liver-based interpretation were superior to 5-point scale and %ΔSUVmax criteria in analyzing the PET-4 and PET-end for the prognosis of DLBCL patients.

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by a grant from Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission [2017-026] and Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Incubating Program [PX2017028]. This retrospective study was performed and approved by an Investigational Review Board of the Peking University Cancer Hospital, and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Potential conflict of interest

Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text of this article online at https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2017.1357171.

Additional information

Funding

Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission2017-026
Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Incubating ProgramPX2017028
The study was supported by a grant from Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission [2017-026] and Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Incubating Program [PX2017028].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.