Cost-effectiveness of response-adapted therapy (RAT) for advanced Hodgkin’s Lymphoma compared with conventional treatment in India: a Markov-model based analysis

Abstract

Cost effectiveness analysis of interim positron emission tomography (PET-2, done after 2 cycles of chemotherapy) based response adaptive therapy (RAT) approaches in advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (aHL) are not available from an Indian perspective. We used a five-year decision analytics model to assess the cost-effectiveness of the two RAT approaches [(escalation (RAT-1) or de-escalation (RAT-2)] compared with standard care (SOC) in aHL (mean age:35 years). Modelling data was derived from secondary sources and sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the model. Net monetary benefit (NMB) gained from RAT2 in Indian rupees (INR) (INR 2,26,896) was higher than the RAT1 (INR 1,83,138) when compared with SOC. Proportion achieving the complete response after initial treatment (CR1) was the key determining factor for the RAT1/2 dominance over SOC. Despite higher initial input costs, response-adapted therapy of aHL was cost-effective by minimizing the cost incurred and disutility experienced during relapse and salvage.

Key findings

Despite higher initial costs, response-adapted therapy based on the interim PET scan after 2 cycles of chemotherapy was more cost-effective when compared to standard therapy with 6 cycles of ABVD in patients with advanced Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Among the RAT approaches, de-escalation (RAT-2) had better cost-effectiveness than the escalation approach (RAT-1).

Keywords:

• Advanced Hodgkin’s lymphoma
• Markov model
• cost-effectiveness analysis
• utility
• response-adapted therapy
• India

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

Health-technology assessment resource center was funded by the Department of Health Research (DHR). Author LG is a junior research fellow funded by an ICMR grant.