Histochemical and morphological evaluation of a glyoxal acid-free fixative

ABSTRACT

The application of most chemical fixatives, such as formalin, in the anatomic pathology laboratory requires safety training and hazardous chemical monitoring due to the toxicity and health risks associated with their use. Consequently, the use of formalin has been banned in most applications in Europe; the primary exception is its use in the histology laboratory in lieu of a suitable and safer alternative. Glyoxal based solutions, several of which are available commercially, are the most promising alternative fixatives, because they are based on a mechanism of fixation similar to that of formalin. Unlike formalin, however, glyoxal based solutions do not dissociate from water and therefore do not require ventilation measures such as a fume hood. A primary barrier to the adoption of commercially available glyoxal based solutions is their low pH, which can produce undesirable morphological and antigenic tissue alterations; however, a recently available neutral pH glyoxal product (glyoxal acid free) (GAF) has been developed to mitigate the challenges of low pH. We compared the morphology and histochemistry among tissues fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, a commercially available acidic glyoxal product (Prefer), and GAF. Tissues fixed in formalin and Prefer exhibited similar morphology and staining properties; tissues fixed with 2% GAF exhibited deleterious effects.

KEYWORDS:

• Bacteria
• fixation
• formalin
• fungi
• glyoxal acid
• glyoxal acid free
• histology
• human
• mice
• tissue storage

Acknowledgments

We thank Lela Coleman and Susan Cooper for their assistance with culturing microorganisms for this study. We also thank Darnell Johnson and Dr. Alan Boom for their willingness to share their anatomical pathology wisdom.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.