Chest-Compression-Only vs. Standard Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Shouldn't We Wait for More Evidence?

Laura S. Gold School of Public Health andCommunity Medicine, Department of Epidemiology, Seattle, Washington; Public Health–Seattle andKing County, Emergency Medical Services Division, Seattle, Washington

, PhC &

Mickey Eisenberg Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Public Health–Seattle andKing County, Emergency Medical Services Division, Seattle, Washington

, MD, PhD

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Chest-Compression-Only vs. Standard Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Shouldn't We Wait for More Evidence?

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Chest-Compression-Only vs. Standard Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Shouldn't We Wait for More Evidence?

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature