Publication Cover
Amyloid
The Journal of Protein Folding Disorders
Volume 25, 2018 - Issue 3
720
Views
37
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Quantitation of 99mTc-DPD uptake in patients with transthyretin-related cardiac amyloidosis

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 203-210 | Received 19 Jun 2018, Accepted 03 Sep 2018, Published online: 28 Nov 2018
 

Abstract

Purpose: Transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis is a rare but serious infiltrative disease associated with a wide spectrum of morphologic and functional cardiac involvement. 99mTc-labelled 3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicarboxylic acid (DPD), initially developed as a bone-seeking radiotracer, is remarkably sensitive for imaging cardiac ATTR amyloid deposits. Our aim was to investigate the feasibility and utility of estimating 99mTc-DPD uptake in myocardial tissue; this has the potential to yield reliable quantitative information on cardiac amyloid burden, which is urgently required to monitor disease progression and response to novel treatments.

Methods: Three methods of quantitation were developed and tested on 74 patients with proven cardiac ATTR amyloidosis who had recently undergone 99mTc-DPD planar whole-body imaging and SPECT-CT. Quantitative results were compared to measurements of extracellular volume fraction (ECV) by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, a validated technique for measuring amyloid burden.

Results: An experienced clinician graded uptake using a widely-used visual scoring system as 1 (n = 15), 2 (n = 39) or 3 (n = 20). Linear correlations between the SPECT and ECV data (p < .001) were demonstrated. None of the methods showed that 99mTc-DPD uptake in the heart was significantly greater in patients with grade-3 uptake than in those with grade-2 uptake.

Conclusions: Quantitation of 99mTc-DPD uptake in cardiac transthyretin amyloid deposits is complex and is hindered by competition for radiotracer with amyloid in skeletal muscle. The latter underlies differences in uptake between grade-2 and grade-3 patients, not cardiac uptake.

Acknowledgements

JCR, DFH, MB, and JP were responsible for data collection and analysis; JAS for development of the in-house OsiriX plugin used; and JDG, ADW, PNH, and MF for interpretation of results and critical review of the manuscript.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

GE Healthcare provided a trial licence for the use of Q.Metrix.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.