Geodesign in historical process: case study insights for improving theory and practice

ABSTRACT

Geodesign theory and practice may be informed and strengthened by studying contrasts between contemporary perspectives and historical processes. In this paper, we disaggregate contemporary geodesign into three trajectories found in the literature: (1) tightly coupled design and impact simulations, (2) a framework for landscape planning, and (3) an organic process. Augmenting these trajectories with two taxonomies of geodesign elements, we look for evidence of geodesign in a longitudinal descriptive case study. Analysis reveals a story of design and planning unfolding over a long period of time at multiple geographic scales interwoven with persistent conflict. The case revealed evidence of geodesign approaches and elements in historical planning and design. The events studied also led to high-quality outcomes that are diffusing regionally. Results of this investigation yield implications for improved geodesign practice and theory including broadening the discourse around geodesign to include time and conflict and expanding geodesign's theoretical frameworks.

KEYWORDS:

• Landscape
• conflict
• planning
• development
• Australia

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Jane Harding, Heritage Coordinator, Noosa Council, for finding and sharing a copy of the oft-referenced 1973 Noosa town plan. Co-author Hamerlinck's participation in this research was supported in part by funding from the Global Engagement Office at the University of Wyoming.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).