Women's awareness of long-acting, reversible contraceptive methods (LARCs) in community family planning clinics and general practice

Abstract

Objectives To investigate whether awareness and choice of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) of women attending a community family planning clinic differ from those of women seeing general practitioners (GPs).

Methods Information was collected from women in their reproductive years about their current contraceptive method, their awareness of LARCs and whether they felt well informed about their options. After additional information was provided the respondents were asked whether they would consider changing their method and if their GP offered this option.

Results Questionnaires were completed by 177 women attending a city-centre contraception and sexual health (CASH) clinic (n = 96) and a GP's surgery in a neighbouring city (n = 81). Forty percent of women in the CASH cohort and 6% in the primary care group were using LARCs. Women attending the CASH service were more aware of their contraceptive options and felt better informed but less than 50% in either group had heard of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. At least 50% of women would consider using a LARC yet few knew if their GP fitted/provided these methods.

Conclusion LARC usage was considerably higher in CASH services compared to primary care. Those providing contraceptive care should give up-to-date information covering all methods and referral to local specialist services, as appropriate.

Keywords:

• Contraception
• Long-acting reversible contraceptives
• LARCs
• Implants
• Injectables
• Intrauterine contraceptives